Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
Tom Donaly wrote: wrote: Cecil Moore wrote: It's pretty easy to understand. Any two radials, 180 degrees apart and high enough, should theoretically cancel each other's radiation in the far field. Not true. How much not true? -45 DB, i.e. negligibly not true. :-) That's what I thought. Sometimes, orders of magnitude are important. Otherwise, people would be worrying about the fact that they're closer to the center of the Earth in the middle of the bottom of a flat bottomed hole than they are at the edges. 73, Tom Donaly, KA6RUH |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Radials | Antenna | |||
Vertical ant gain vs No radials | Antenna | |||
Radials for a Vertical ? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |