Cecil Moore wrote:
John Popelish wrote:

Remember, it is Cecil, not me, who demands agreement or eternal verbal
torture.


I don't demand agreement, John, just resolution.

Resolution in who's mind?

I don't demand anything. I just read, occasionally throw out a
thought, and learn what I can. I accept that sometimes I will learn
something that is wrong, but I just keep trying to fit the pieces
together.

John Popelish wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:
I don't demand agreement, John, just resolution.

Resolution in who's mind?

In mine, of course. I am obsessive-compulsive that way.
Sorry about that - it's probably a character flaw.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

Cecil Moore wrote:
John Popelish wrote:

Cecil Moore wrote:

I don't demand agreement, John, just resolution.

Resolution in who's mind?

In mine, of course. I am obsessive-compulsive that way.
Sorry about that - it's probably a character flaw.

Then you also probably believe that a character flaw is an absolute,
as are and evil.

John Popelish wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:

John Popelish wrote:

Cecil Moore wrote:

I don't demand agreement, John, just resolution.


Resolution in who's mind?


In mine, of course. I am obsessive-compulsive that way.
Sorry about that - it's probably a character flaw.


Then you also probably believe that a character flaw is an absolute, as
are and evil.

I dropped a word during editing. That should have read:

Then you also probably believe that a character flaw is an absolute,
as are good and evil.

John Popelish wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:
I am obsessive-compulsive that way.
Sorry about that - it's probably a character flaw.

Then you also probably believe that a character flaw is an absolute, as
are (good) and evil.

"If it's not a 'one' or a 'zero', it's broke." :-)
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp