Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Ron wrote: Ok I am getting confused. You are saying that a groundplane will not work as good a a ground mounted vertical ? At what angle are you talking about? Are you more interested in working 500 miles or 6,000 miles? Ron Nope. I think the elevated ground plane is superior to the ground mount as long as it's high enough in the air to avoid excess ground loss. As far as long haul, there may not be too large a difference if each system is equal as far as ground loss. IE: a ground mount with 120 radials, and a GP at 1/2 wave high with 4 radials should show about the same efficiency. So for long haul dx, they should be fairly close in theory. But... You have a better ground/space wave with the elevated antenna. This can come in handy when talking 50-100 miles away when the band doesn't support NVIS with a dipole, etc.. When you run the elevated antenna, you must always think of height in terms of wavelength, not feet or meters. A 2 meter GP can be fairly low, and still very efficient. But not a low band GP. A half wave is a different height on each band. Being I recommend a minimum of 1/4 wave height when using only 4 radials, that can be pretty high on a lower frequency. On 40m, I ran one at 36 ft at the base of the radiator. Thats just over 1/4 wave up. If I ran the same antenna on 80m, I would have to mount it at 72 ft to have the same efficiency. About 145 ft on 160m. Soooo...If you can't go that high, you must increase the number of radials to lower the ground losses to a equal number. If you have a ground mount with 120 radials, you need about 60 radials if the antenna is at 1/8 wave. About 8-12 radials if the antenna is at 1/4 wave. About 3-4 radials if the antenna is at 1/2 wave. All these have the same appx ground losses. So you can see, if you run a 80m ground plane at 15 ft, the ground losses will be high unless you use a whole lot of radials. So in that case, it's really more practical to use the ground mount unless you don't mind all that wire in the air. But equal loss ground mount vs ground plane? I'd take the ground plane anyday... I ran one on 40m and it kicked serious butt on long haul dx. And yes, I use the verticals on the low bands for mostly long haul. I use dipoles, etc for NVIS. MK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Radials | Antenna | |||
Vertical ant gain vs No radials | Antenna | |||
Radials for a Vertical ? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |