Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roy Lewallen" wrote in message ... snip A normal ground plane is a large sheet of metal that reflects the radio wave emitted by the radiating element. "Normal"? Where have you seen an antenna mounted over a metal ground plane many wavelengths in diameter? Perhaps a UHF antenna in the middle of the top of a car, but that's about it. snip Which prompts me to ask a question: If a quarterwave vertical antenna has many radials only a few feet above the ground, and these radials could be made progressively longer and longer, does the antenna eventually fail to "know" where the ground is? How long is "very long" to bring this about (if it happens)? I kicked some numbers around. By the formula two times antenna_length-squared divided by wavelength [2D^2/lambda], I make the far-field distance for a 14 MHz quarterwave vertical be only 2.5 meters [less than a quarter wavelength] ... but typical radials are already longer than that, aren't they? So this isn't a near-field/far-field boundary issue, is it? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Radials | Antenna | |||
Vertical ant gain vs No radials | Antenna | |||
Radials for a Vertical ? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |