| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I thought Id mention that one of the things that was overlooked in the
Titantic disccusion is the CW was not invovled it was spark gap used in that Morse encoded spark Actually that is not correct. Within the original meaning of CW, the Titanic used a CW transmitter. It was not a spark transmitter, the rf energy was produced by an alternator which provided 'continuous' rf power, hence CW. The output was not a damped wave that a spark transmitter would produce, but an interrupted 'continuous wave' (from the alternator). Regards Jeff |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Persuing a Career in Electronics, HELP! | Homebrew | |||
| Bonafied Proof of LIFE AFTER DEATH -- Coal Mine Rescue | Shortwave | |||