| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
August 28th 06, 01:42 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
|
|||
|
|||
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
Eh? Now you say its ok to be slow? Make up your mind will ya? People are
dying while you decide! rb "Al Klein" wrote in message ... On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 18:22:21 GMT, Dave Oldridge wrote: Al Klein wrote in m: Really? You can write a spoken language you don't understand well enough to be read by someone who understands it? Maybe. Maybe not. In CW, you can. I can do it (and have done so) using phonetics. But that's SLOWER than CW. You're preaching to the choir, Dave. I've had to handle foreign language traffic phonetically by voice and by CW - and I much prefer CW for that kind of work, even though I prefer voice for most rag-chewing. As you say, needing it spelled out is quite slow. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Persuing a Career in Electronics, HELP! | Homebrew | |||
| Bonafied Proof of LIFE AFTER DEATH -- Coal Mine Rescue | Shortwave | |||
Threaded Mode
