| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#15
July 21st 06, 07:11 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
Is It double bazooka less noisy?
Cecil Moore wrote: wrote: I A B tested a regular low dipole made from number 8 AWG bare wire against a double bazooka. Even during severe weather there never was a difference in measureable noise levels. Did you A B test them under precipitation static conditions? If not, the test was incomplete. There is obviously a charged particle difference between a bare wire dipole and a double bazooka. If you weren't testing using charged particles, the test was just as obviously incomplete. Cecil, There is absolutely no reason to believe that one antenna is less responsive to charged particle noise than the other. Whether or not the antenna can accumulate a static charge is a separate issue. 73, ac6xg |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Double Bazooka? | Antenna | |||
| Double Bazooka question | Antenna | |||
| FS: Connectors, Antennas, Meters, Mounts, etc. | Antenna | |||
| FS: Connectors/Adapters/Meters/Etc. | Equipment | |||
| FS: Connectors/Adapters/Meters/Etc. | Equipment | |||
Threaded Mode
