| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Cecil Moore" wrote in message y.net... Reg Edwards wrote: Perhaps some kind person who has been able to afford the latest issue of NEC4 could calculate the radiating efficiency of a typical vertical antenna of height 9 metres (29.5 feet) and diameter 50mm (2 inches) - - when fed against a ground system of 50 uniformly distributed radial wires, each 1.64mm in diameter (14 AWG) buried to a depth of 25mm (1 inch), of length 10 metres - Would it help to model this in EZNEC with the radials 1/1000 of a wavelength above ground? Just heard a funny line on Stargate SG-1 on TV: "This planet is as dead as a Texas salad bar." -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp Ground planes above ground can approximate the results from buried radials. The wires should be several wire diameters above the ground, and not 10^(-6) wavelengths -- providing that a finite ground, Sommerfeld/Norton method, is used. The reflection coefficient approximation will produce large errors. 73, Frank |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| Length & number of radials | Antenna | |||
| Radials | Antenna | |||