Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frank,
So NEC4 cannot calculate input impedance of the radial system and we have almost reached a dead end. Would it be possible to insert a loading coil ( 2.48 uH ) at the bottom of the antenna to tune out its input reactance ( which is what my program does.) Then repeat the efficiency calculation and tell me what you get. ---- Reg. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Frank, So NEC4 cannot calculate input impedance of the radial system and we have almost reached a dead end. Would it be possible to insert a loading coil ( 2.48 uH ) at the bottom of the antenna to tune out its input reactance ( which is what my program does.) Then repeat the efficiency calculation and tell me what you get. ---- Reg. =================================== Frank, Alternatively, or in addition to, you could shift frequency nearer to 8.3 MHz where the antenna is resonant and its input reactance is zero. And again do the efficiency calculation. Tell me what the efficiency is and the frequency. Also the antenna input resistance. You will see I am desperately trying to localise the discrepancy in efficiency. It is either in the radials or in the antenna. You should also learn something about NEC4. ---- Reg. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Reg Edwards" wrote in message
... Frank, So NEC4 cannot calculate input impedance of the radial system and we have almost reached a dead end. Would it be possible to insert a loading coil ( 2.48 uH ) at the bottom of the antenna to tune out its input reactance ( which is what my program does.) Then repeat the efficiency calculation and tell me what you get. ---- Reg. Reg, According to NEC 4.1 the input impedance is near 40 ohms (39.9373 + j 0.394926 ohms) at resonance (8.07 MHz). With 100 W input the total radiated power computes to 31.8 W. I am continuing with checking the program to be certain I have not made an error, and also working on a NEC solution to the input impedance of one radial. Note that the computation also includes copper loss, which should be insignificant. I have also included a copy of my code below. Frank CM Reg's test Vertical CE GW 1 36 0 0 9 0 0 0.05 GC 0 0 .9 0.00082 0.00082 GW 38 3 0 0 0.05 0 0 -0.025 0.00082 GW 2 40 0 0 -0.025 0 10 -0.025 GC 0 0 1.11 0.00082 0.00082 GM 1 35 0 0 10 0 0 0 2 1 2 40 GE -1 GN 2 0 0 0 16 0.0067 FR 0 1 0 0 8.07 0.01 EX 0 38 2 00 89.37696044 0 LD 5 1 1 36 5.8001E7....... ........................ ......................... LD 5 36 1 60 5.8001E7 RP 0 181 1 1000 -90 90 1.00000 1.00000 EN |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Length & number of radials | Antenna | |||
Radials | Antenna |