Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Antonio Vernucci" ) writes:
I would like to build an old-style receiver using a BC-453 stuck at 500-kHz as IF chain. A possibility would be to put a pentode in front of the BC-453 mixing the incoming RF signal with the signal generated by a variable local oscillator (VFO). To improve selectivity, one could adopt a regenerative arrangement whereby part of the pentode plate signal is fed back into the grid (by inductive coupling), and the cathode resistor is then adjusted just before the tube starts oscillating. In other words, a kind of Q-multiplying converter (I think this is called "Q-dyne" receiver). What I am not fully sure about is if the increased selectivity I so obtain turns into a higher rejection of the image frequency, or just into a narrowing of the received bandwidth (which is already narrowed down by the tight BC-453 85-kHz IF transformers). My feeling is that said regenerative scheme would offer no advantage in terms of image rejection, but I would value very much your opinion on that subject. A) There's really no reason to "boost" the selectivity of the BC-453. They were once seen as the ultimate in selectivy, at a time when there were few options. If the IF is too wide, then you need to adjust it. B) The Q-Multiplier works by adding regeneration, but the prime point is just before it oscillates. Which means that when you need it to oscillate to provide a beat note, you lose control of selectivity. And the proper point is so sharp that external factors will kick the circuit into oscillation. Which is where the superregen came in, keeping it at that crucial point of highest gain without the need for crucial tuning (but incidentally bringing other problems into play). C) If you have a self-oscillating converter, which seems like you are talking about, note the regen to the point of oscillation is at the oscillator's frequency. That's not going to do a thing on the signal frequency, and it's not going to do a thing on the IF frequency. A mixer by definition has a different frequency on the input from the output, which does not make for proper regeneration. Unless they were modified, most BC-453's were used in multiple conversion schemes. Either tapped into the 455KHz IF of an existing receiver (and if the existing receiver was single conversion, leaving its image problem intact), or as a tuneable receiver with some sort of converter ahead of it. The better ones used two stages of conversion, to get around the image problem that arose with a high signal frequency dropping immediately down to 455KHz. Michael VE2BVW |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Seeking advice from IFR 1600S users... | General | |||
Seeking advice for an all-band radio. | Shortwave | |||
Seeking advice on balun | Antenna | |||
what to get, seeking advice | Scanner | |||
Seeking advice from IFR 1600S users... | General |