Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Randy or Sherry Guttery" wrote in message ... Brian Hill wrote: Yes a sweep gen and oscilloscope are nice in this regard but the job can be done correctly using a accurate sig gen or at least close enough for this type of rig. Yes, someone with a mile of patience might get all sections tuned right with a stable gen - I'm just not that patient, and "close enough" probably depends on how good of performance someone is willing to settle for. best regards... -- randy guttery A Tender Tale - a page dedicated to those Ships and Crews so vital to the United States Silent Service: http://tendertale.com I suppose but I've done well using just Sig Gen. I guess being bald and not having any hair to pull out helps. I guess if a AR-88 was the only radio I owned and my shack wasn't plum full of vintage and modern gear I'd probably fire up the sweep and scope to align one. But I've gotten pretty good results with the old HP 8640. It's spot on and I keep it in good shape. But yes your right, a sweep and scope to peek the IF on freq is optimum. PS, I still use a matchbook cover to set the points on my model T. ![]() -- Regards B.H. Hill Amplification http://hillamplification.com Brian's Radio Universe http://webpages.charter.net/brianhill/500.htm |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Good Places to Buy Shortwave Receivers? | Shortwave | |||
Good AM Medium Wave Receivers? | Shortwave | |||
PC-based receivers any good? | Shortwave | |||
good sw receivers on the web | Shortwave |