Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old May 22nd 08, 01:52 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 241
Default HQ-145 Opinions?

The HQ-150 is a glorified HQ-140. It has a Q multiplier (in addition to the
crystal filter) and a 100 kHz calibrator. It is single conversion. My
opinion is that the HQ-145 is better than the others for general coverage -
except the HQ-180 and the SP-600.

Hammarlund did make a couple of transmitters - the HX-50 and HX-500. They
were a different style and probably more suited to the HQ-170 or other
receiver that specialized in receiving sideband.

I have Johnson Adventurer and it is a good "no-frills" cw rig and would
match up with the 145 nicely.

73, Colin K7FM


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pro-34 opinions Buzzygirl Scanner 16 September 10th 05 01:36 PM
Another HB VNA - opinions, please... John Miles Homebrew 4 August 12th 04 10:19 PM
Need Opinions Please... Biz WDØHCO Boatanchors 5 May 10th 04 05:30 PM
Need Opinions Please.... Biz WDØHCO Homebrew 14 May 3rd 04 11:42 PM
Need Opinions Please.... Biz WDØHCO Homebrew 0 May 2nd 04 02:10 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017