Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I knew a guy who wanted me to fix up an old S-40 for him to prepare for such
a day. I asked him how he was going to run it. He said a vibrator inverter would convert a storage battery to 120 volts. I asked him how he was going to charge the storage battery. He said solar panels. I then mentioned that since solar panels were semiconductor junctions, they would all fail when the radios failed. I think the hand crank would be the option. But, you can only crank so long until you tire out. The military hand crank systems are so tiring to operate that someone has to be shooting at the cranker before he cranks. 73, Colin K7FM |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Should work fine. A better solution is a steam engine that runs on any
fuel, including grain alcohol. If there is no one on the radio, you can drink the stuff. Colin K7FM |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 6, 4:00*pm, (Edmund H. Ramm) wrote:
In "COLIN LAMB" writes: [...] I think the hand crank would be the option. [...] * *What about a governor-controlled Diesel engine driving an ac generator? * *73, Eddi ._._. -- * * * e-mail: dk3uz AT arrl DOT net *| *AMPRNET: * * * If replying to a Usenet article, please use above e-mail address. * * * * * * * *Linux/m68k, the best U**x ever to hit an Atari! The fuel coming from? I think Colin has the idea! Use one of the WWII British steam radios that were used in the south-west Pacific. They were 'powered' by the camp fire. Am I correct in thinking that the sets intended to be 'crank powered' used mostly direct heated [battery] tubes and those fast heating direct power tubes that looked like a metal 6L6? One would think that the design would minimize the waste power, simply because of the limited output of the [human] power source. Neil S. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Edmund H. Ramm wrote:
The fuel coming from? From the oil tank (central heating) in my cellar. Several thousand liters to burn, more than I'll be able to use before radiation poisoning will get the better of me. snip Hi, The thing about an EMP device is that it is meant to be detonated at a very high altitude, so there is no radiation poisoning on the ground. Since the device doesn't directly cause loss of human life, the attacked country has a quandry whether or not to launch a "mutual assured destruction" response. A lot of the large power plant a.c. generators would be knocked out, because they use "brushless exciters" for the rotor. The rotor is excited by a small separately controlled a.c. field, and uses large semiconductor diodes that spin along with it, to create the needed d.c. within the rotor windings. 73, Ed Knobloch |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FM HD in its current form will likely survive it's unlikely AM HD will fail. | Shortwave | |||
What Liberal Talk Radio Needs to Do - To Survive and Grow [Was: Al Franken on shortwave] | Shortwave |