On 08/25/2013 09:50 AM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 8/25/2013 10:46 AM, philo wrote:
On 08/25/2013 09:25 AM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
X

snip

And if you still think everyone else is wrong, perhaps you need to
rewrite the physics books. I'm sure the entire world would love to be
"enlightened" by your misconceptions. I've been licensed since 1967,
(in fact my first receiver was a Hallicrafters SK-43) have studied them
in college and designed circuits around them, and I actually understand
how they work. No one here has asked a non-pertinent question - or
provided non-pertinent information.

Meanwhile, if you want help on this or any other list or forum, I highly
suggest you change your approach. The one you are using will quickly
drive people away from trying to help you.



Unfortunately "gareth" is a troll and has now been filtered from my feed.

In the years I have been on Usenet I have seen numerous rambling and
unfocused questions but I always give the poster the benefit of the
doubt at first. As soon as they attack those trying to help, I realize
they are just trolling and no longer view their posts.

Yup, I figured that out after reading u.r.a. Thanks for the confirmation.




Well, I never let trolls bother me too much...but I suppose I should
really check my own kill-filter to determine whether or not it's a
Butterworth : )

On 8/25/2013 10:54 AM, philo wrote:
On 08/25/2013 09:50 AM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 8/25/2013 10:46 AM, philo wrote:
On 08/25/2013 09:25 AM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
X

snip

And if you still think everyone else is wrong, perhaps you need to
rewrite the physics books. I'm sure the entire world would love to be
"enlightened" by your misconceptions. I've been licensed since 1967,
(in fact my first receiver was a Hallicrafters SK-43) have studied them
in college and designed circuits around them, and I actually understand
how they work. No one here has asked a non-pertinent question - or
provided non-pertinent information.

Meanwhile, if you want help on this or any other list or forum, I
highly
suggest you change your approach. The one you are using will quickly
drive people away from trying to help you.



Unfortunately "gareth" is a troll and has now been filtered from my
feed.

In the years I have been on Usenet I have seen numerous rambling and
unfocused questions but I always give the poster the benefit of the
doubt at first. As soon as they attack those trying to help, I realize
they are just trolling and no longer view their posts.

Yup, I figured that out after reading u.r.a. Thanks for the
confirmation.




Well, I never let trolls bother me too much...but I suppose I should
really check my own kill-filter to determine whether or not it's a
Butterworth : )

Don't bother - he doesn't know the difference, so it's unrelated to his
question (IOW, he can't answer, so he blames everyone else for his
ignorance).

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K

==================

On 08/25/2013 09:59 AM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 8/25/2013 10:54 AM, philo wrote:
On 08/25/2013 09:50 AM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 8/25/2013 10:46 AM, philo wrote:
On 08/25/2013 09:25 AM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
X

snip

And if you still think everyone else is wrong, perhaps you need to
rewrite the physics books. I'm sure the entire world would love to be
"enlightened" by your misconceptions. I've been licensed since 1967,
(in fact my first receiver was a Hallicrafters SK-43) have studied
them
in college and designed circuits around them, and I actually
understand
how they work. No one here has asked a non-pertinent question - or
provided non-pertinent information.

Meanwhile, if you want help on this or any other list or forum, I
highly
suggest you change your approach. The one you are using will quickly
drive people away from trying to help you.



Unfortunately "gareth" is a troll and has now been filtered from my
feed.

In the years I have been on Usenet I have seen numerous rambling and
unfocused questions but I always give the poster the benefit of the
doubt at first. As soon as they attack those trying to help, I realize
they are just trolling and no longer view their posts.

Yup, I figured that out after reading u.r.a. Thanks for the
confirmation.




Well, I never let trolls bother me too much...but I suppose I should
really check my own kill-filter to determine whether or not it's a
Butterworth : )

Don't bother - he doesn't know the difference, so it's unrelated to his
question (IOW, he can't answer, so he blames everyone else for his
ignorance).




I just stuck that in their to give him a taste of his own medicine, so
to speak.,,,but I should have just ignored the guy in the first place.

"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...

Don't bother - he doesn't know the difference, so it's unrelated to his
question (IOW, he can't answer, so he blames everyone else for his
ignorance).


Grow up, OM, that you may disagree with a technical matter is
nojustification
for you to sling abusive remarks, perhaps in an attempt to make yourself
feel better?

A single crystal filter together with its phasing control both fed
differentially
from either side of a transformer secondary cannot be Butterworth,
Tchebychev,
Elliptical, Cohn or any other multi pole filter that you would care to
posit,
simply because there are only two poles

As to not knowing the difference, it does appear that once again you exhibit
Freudian projection.

"gareth" wrote:
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...

Don't bother - he doesn't know the difference, so it's unrelated to his
question (IOW, he can't answer, so he blames everyone else for his
ignorance).


Grow up, OM, that you may disagree with a technical matter is
nojustification
for you to sling abusive remarks, perhaps in an attempt to make yourself
feel better?

A single crystal filter together with its phasing control both fed
differentially
from either side of a transformer secondary cannot be Butterworth,
Tchebychev,
Elliptical, Cohn or any other multi pole filter that you would care to
posit,
simply because there are only two poles

As to not knowing the difference, it does appear that once again you exhibit
Freudian projection.

That's it Gareth, when in over your head, keep swinging wildly! Ah, that
indefatigable Welsh spirit!

--
If the above message is full of spelling mistakes or the snipping is duff,
it's probably because it was sent from my iPhone, likely whilst walking.
Apologies!

If the above message is full of spelling mistakes or the snipping is duff,
it's probably because it was sent from my iPhone, likely whilst walking.
Apologies!

Full of excuses...just like brian avoiding CW for decades.......always some
excuse........

"Stephen Thomas Cole" wrote in message
...
That's it Gareth, when in over your head, keep swinging wildly! Ah, that
indefatigable Welsh spirit!

One day he'll work out that when you're in a hole the worst thing you can do
is keep digging. Don't tell him, though, it would spoil all the fun.
--
;-)
..
73 de Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI - mine's a pint.
..
http://turner-smith.co.uk