Wymsey wrote:
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 14:40:33 +0100, Percy Picacity wrote:

What I don't accept is that Chaz
has been tested to any competency with regards to current licence
conditions and regulatory matters, as he dodged sitting the correct
exam for his callsign by cashing in a decades old bit of paper. Whilst
the RAE may be a perfectly thorough qualification, what relevance does
a pass certificate from a 40 year old RAE have on the current licence
conditions that competence must be demonstrated in?

What STC does not realize is that I have the same qualifications as he
does plus a proper C & G qualification and decades of appropriate
experience. He really should do some research before he spouts off.

None of which are pertinent in demonstrating competence in the licence
conditions and regulatory matters that are germane to the licence class
that you now hold and operate under having cashed in your RAE 40 years
after the fact.


On 30th March 2007 I took the Foundation Examination and passed,
Candidate Number 17526.

On the same evening, 30th March 2007 I took the Intermediate Examination
and passed. Same Candidate Number.


So, you acknowledge that you have been tested and shown competent to
operate under your 2E0WYM call and no higher. Thank you.

His continual insulting behaviour is now terminally boring.


Says the guy following me around unn.* hurling insults at me.

I suggest we close this thread and let him get on with it.

I'm happy to walk away from this, my position having been vindicated.

--
If the above message is full of spelling mistakes or the snipping is duff,
it's probably because it was sent from my iPhone, likely whilst walking.
Apologies!