| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 26/08/13 14:40, Percy Picacity wrote:
The direct implication......is that licensed amateurs should be retested regularly for the same reason. In any case, I cannot think of any way in which the requirements have become more onerous or significantly different; rather the reverse. About 3 years ago someone kindly posted in link to the sample paper on the IRTS site - the 60 questions in 2 hours one. I finished in 20 minutes with a score of 90%, let down through two arithmetical errors and a lack of familiarity with the EI licence conditions. A real exam would have got me a HAREC, and the club-administered Morse test would be simplicity itself. Two-letter EI call in prospect? If regular re-testing was brought in, just think of the thousands of lifetime FLs that would fail - but it won't happen, the income stream's too much of a draw. -- Spike |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| single rebate date , single recommended price , single recommended price | Dx | |||
| Phasing Verticals | Antenna | |||
| DRM signal and reception compared to analogue .... | Shortwave | |||
| Radio Shack PRO-97 No reception of audio signal | Scanner | |||
| Single frequency (channel) TRF for AM/BCB reception? Candidate Radios of Yesteryear? | Shortwave | |||