Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"gareth" wrote: "Percy Picacity" wrote in message ... In article , "gareth" wrote: But the fact remains that for those who understand the use of a crystal phasing control in pre-1950 receivers that the questions as posed above are as completely informative as is necessary. And you have had your answer - the tuning of the BFO has no effect on the phasing control and vice versa. Do you not believe the answer? Stating the bleeding obvious which we all knew any way is about as useful and as relevant as quoting Newton's laws of motion; for neither are an appropriate response to the query as originally put. I refer you page 79 of the previously mentioned book. Sorry, perhaps you could tell us what the question was again. I thought you were asking if there was an advantage to tuning the BFO half way between the wanted and unwanted signals. There isn't. -- Percy Picacity |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
single rebate date , single recommended price , single recommended price | Dx | |||
Phasing Verticals | Antenna | |||
DRM signal and reception compared to analogue .... | Shortwave | |||
Radio Shack PRO-97 No reception of audio signal | Scanner | |||
Single frequency (channel) TRF for AM/BCB reception? Candidate Radios of Yesteryear? | Shortwave |