If his certificate is 40 years old he will have passed the old written
exam and not the current multiple choice paper. Have you seen any of the
question papers from that era?

;-)
.
73 de Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI - mine's a pint.
.

he won't be able to understand the questions never mind write an answer in
longhand....just another ticky box dickhead.......nice to be in his killfile
though...he obviously is intimidated by quality ....

On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 09:26:55 +0000, Stephen Thomas Cole wrote:

Someone please explain to the wally what provable lies about a person can
lead to. I can't be bothered!

Libel 1: "The pirate 2E0WYM here"

Libel 2: "masquerading as a full licensee"

Libel 3: "cashing in an allegedly 40 year old RAE pass certificate
to dodge the current, rigorous Full Licence exam."

I just wish he had the sense not to behave in this manner, particularly
in the groups that I frequent!

plonk)


--
M0WYM
Sales @ radiowymsey
http://stores.ebay.co.uk/Sales-At-Radio-Wymsey/
http://sales-at-radio-wymsey.ebid.net/

On 8/26/2013 5:26 AM, Stephen Thomas Cole wrote:
Wymsey wrote:
On Sun, 25 Aug 2013 10:57:47 -0400, Jerry Stuckle wrote:

ROFLMAO. I would have loved to see that!

You should know that nearly everyone in ukra has a colourful past, some
more recent than others, some abusive, some not, as you will see if you
check out the postings of the person you are replying to.

More laughing guarranteed.


Indeed. The pirate 2E0WYM here, for example, is masquerading as a full
licensee, having avoided training to the correct standard by fortuitously
"finding" and cashing in an allegedly 40 year old RAE pass certificate to
dodge the current, rigorous Full Licence exam.


Hmmm, I don't know about over there, but here in the U.S., the tests
were MUCH harder 42 years ago when I passed my Amateur Extra exam.
Tests were administered by FCC personnel, not volunteer examiners. The
question pool was not published, and you had to actually know and
understand electronics and the laws to pass it. In fact, I found the
Amateur Extra to be harder than either the Second or First Class
Radiotelephone (commercial) test i had passed 9 months earlier (back
then you had to have General or above to test for the Amateur Extra).

Nowadays here you can sit in class, memorize the answers and pass all of
the tests before going home for dinner.


--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.

==================

On 26/08/13 10:40, Percy Picacity wrote:

AMI, that is almost certainly an actionable libel. Shame I doubt if you
have enough money to be worth suing.

Thanks for injecting some uncomfortable reality here, while noting it
isn't the first time you've said something on these lines to the person
concerned.

I see it's now gone rather quiet, for some reason, although it might be
that the backchannels could be a little busy.


--
Spike

Hmmm, I don't know about over there, but here in the U.S., the tests were
MUCH harder 42 years ago when I passed my Amateur Extra exam. Tests were
administered by FCC personnel, not volunteer examiners.

spot on ...just dross in the hobby these days ......

"Spike" wrote in message
...
On 26/08/13 10:40, Percy Picacity wrote:

AMI, that is almost certainly an actionable libel. Shame I doubt if you
have enough money to be worth suing.

Thanks for injecting some uncomfortable reality here, while noting it
isn't the first time you've said something on these lines to the person
concerned.

I see it's now gone rather quiet, for some reason, although it might be
that the backchannels could be a little busy.


Spike

he will be getting advice from his big mucker....he knows how to proceed in
these matters.

"Fred Roberts" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 10:24:28 +0100, "Jim GM4DHJ ..."
wrote:


I blame the masons...never mind the polis man probably paid dearly for
believing what another mason probably told him ......

Indeed, the plonker STC conveniently forgets or probably doesn't know
where the events ended.

true....karma

Wymsey wrote:

He's just trying to wind me up Ian. He won't succeed

Clearly I have.



--
If the above message is full of spelling mistakes or the snipping is duff,
it's probably because it was sent from my iPhone, likely whilst walking.
Apologies!

Wymsey wrote:
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 09:26:55 +0000, Stephen Thomas Cole wrote:

Someone please explain to the wally what provable lies about a person can
lead to. I can't be bothered!

You can't be bothered, yet you're firing off replies all over the shop?
Looks like you're gotten to.


Libel 1: "The pirate 2E0WYM here"

Libel 2: "masquerading as a full licensee"

Libel 3: "cashing in an allegedly 40 year old RAE pass certificate
to dodge the current, rigorous Full Licence exam."


Chaz, you admitted that you dodged the Full exam by cashing in an old pass
certificate.

I just wish he had the sense not to behave in this manner, particularly
in the groups that I frequent!

plonk)


Didn't you have me killfiled already or was that a lie?

--
If the above message is full of spelling mistakes or the snipping is duff,
it's probably because it was sent from my iPhone, likely whilst walking.
Apologies!

Percy Picacity wrote:
In article ,
Stephen Thomas Cole wrote:

Wymsey wrote:
On Sun, 25 Aug 2013 10:57:47 -0400, Jerry Stuckle wrote:

ROFLMAO. I would have loved to see that!

You should know that nearly everyone in ukra has a colourful past, some
more recent than others, some abusive, some not, as you will see if you
check out the postings of the person you are replying to.

More laughing guarranteed.


Indeed. The pirate 2E0WYM here, for example, is masquerading as a full
licensee, having avoided training to the correct standard by fortuitously
"finding" and cashing in an allegedly 40 year old RAE pass certificate to
dodge the current, rigorous Full Licence exam.

AMI, that is almost certainly an actionable libel. Shame I doubt if you
have enough money to be worth suing.

Percy, you spend too much time pontificating in uk.legal.moderated, my
hysterical friend.

--
If the above message is full of spelling mistakes or the snipping is duff,
it's probably because it was sent from my iPhone, likely whilst walking.
Apologies!