LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10   Report Post  
Old August 27th 13, 10:28 PM posted to uk.radio.amateur,rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2008
Posts: 618
Default Crystal phasing & single signal reception

On Tue, 27 Aug 2013, gareth wrote:

"Percy Picacity" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"gareth" wrote:
"Percy Picacity" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"gareth" wrote:
But the fact remains that for those who understand the use of a
crystal
phasing control in pre-1950
receivers that the questions as posed above are as completely
informative
as
is necessary.
And you have had your answer - the tuning of the BFO has no effect on
the phasing control and vice versa. Do you not believe the answer?
Stating the bleeding obvious which we all knew any way is about as useful
and as relevant as quoting Newton's laws of motion; for neither are an
appropriate
response to the query as originally put.
I refer you page 79 of the previously mentioned book.


Sorry, perhaps you could tell us what the question was again. I thought
you were asking if there was an advantage to tuning the BFO half way
between the wanted and unwanted signals. There isn't.


There is. You get single signal reception for CW despite the wide bandwidth
of
a trnasformer-only IF strip.

No. single signal reception comes when you actually have decent bandwidth.
You can get that from IF transformers, if the IF frequency is low enough,
all those receivers that had a final IF at 50 or 85KHz.

As I said, you don't even need to have the notch, if you adjust the filter
"right" the notch is never there. You still get single signal
selectivity, because the other image is knocked out by being out of the
passband of the filter. The notch feature just adds to the thing.

You could just string a bunch of RC amplifiers together, be they triodes
or bipolar transistors or FETs, and then put matched crystals from the
"cathode" or whatever to ground. The crystal acts as a very selective
bypass capacitor, very low impedance at the signal frequency, so gain
happens then, and high impedance elsewhere, so gain tapers off. It's not
perfect and the selectivity requires a lower IF, but it's a simple scheme.
I've thought of making a WWV receiver that way, just some stages of
amplification with 10MHz crystals, and a diode detector.

Or pick some crystals all on the same frequency, and make a ladder filter.
Some have even worked on those so you can actually use the same crystals
for narrow (CW) and wide (SSB) reception, though sometimes it seems easier
to just use parallel filters, pick a frequency where the crystals are
cheap.

Michael VE2BVW



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
single rebate date , single recommended price , single recommended price [email protected] Dx 0 September 1st 07 05:15 PM
Phasing Verticals John Phillips Antenna 23 November 4th 06 07:58 PM
DRM signal and reception compared to analogue .... bazar radio Shortwave 1 September 30th 06 03:30 AM
Radio Shack PRO-97 No reception of audio signal [email protected] Scanner 1 February 15th 06 12:59 AM
Single frequency (channel) TRF for AM/BCB reception? Candidate Radios of Yesteryear? Jon Noring Shortwave 10 June 12th 04 04:51 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017