Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013, gareth wrote:
"Percy Picacity" wrote in message ... In article , "gareth" wrote: "Percy Picacity" wrote in message ... In article , "gareth" wrote: But the fact remains that for those who understand the use of a crystal phasing control in pre-1950 receivers that the questions as posed above are as completely informative as is necessary. And you have had your answer - the tuning of the BFO has no effect on the phasing control and vice versa. Do you not believe the answer? Stating the bleeding obvious which we all knew any way is about as useful and as relevant as quoting Newton's laws of motion; for neither are an appropriate response to the query as originally put. I refer you page 79 of the previously mentioned book. Sorry, perhaps you could tell us what the question was again. I thought you were asking if there was an advantage to tuning the BFO half way between the wanted and unwanted signals. There isn't. There is. You get single signal reception for CW despite the wide bandwidth of a trnasformer-only IF strip. No. single signal reception comes when you actually have decent bandwidth. You can get that from IF transformers, if the IF frequency is low enough, all those receivers that had a final IF at 50 or 85KHz. As I said, you don't even need to have the notch, if you adjust the filter "right" the notch is never there. You still get single signal selectivity, because the other image is knocked out by being out of the passband of the filter. The notch feature just adds to the thing. You could just string a bunch of RC amplifiers together, be they triodes or bipolar transistors or FETs, and then put matched crystals from the "cathode" or whatever to ground. The crystal acts as a very selective bypass capacitor, very low impedance at the signal frequency, so gain happens then, and high impedance elsewhere, so gain tapers off. It's not perfect and the selectivity requires a lower IF, but it's a simple scheme. I've thought of making a WWV receiver that way, just some stages of amplification with 10MHz crystals, and a diode detector. Or pick some crystals all on the same frequency, and make a ladder filter. Some have even worked on those so you can actually use the same crystals for narrow (CW) and wide (SSB) reception, though sometimes it seems easier to just use parallel filters, pick a frequency where the crystals are cheap. Michael VE2BVW |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
single rebate date , single recommended price , single recommended price | Dx | |||
Phasing Verticals | Antenna | |||
DRM signal and reception compared to analogue .... | Shortwave | |||
Radio Shack PRO-97 No reception of audio signal | Scanner | |||
Single frequency (channel) TRF for AM/BCB reception? Candidate Radios of Yesteryear? | Shortwave |