On 7/21/2014 5:17 AM, gareth wrote:
"Scott Smith" wrote in message
...
Heathkit SB-303 Receiver
Heathkit SB-303 Receiver, Excellant Cond, Covers the 80, 40, 20, 15 and 10
meter bands (plus 15 MHz rx). Nice Cond, clean inside, good solder joins,
but only recieves various tones when tuning ????, Cost new $400 plus
building time, best off over $200, call 559-255-9110 or email



April 1st was nearly 3 months ago.



Typical troll response - showing his head is once again (or still?) up
his arse.

The SB-303 is a good receiver. I'd love to add it to my shack - but the
XYL would have a fit.


--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K

==================

"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
On 7/21/2014 5:17 AM, gareth wrote:
"Scott Smith" wrote in message
...
Heathkit SB-303 Receiver
Heathkit SB-303 Receiver, Excellant Cond, Covers the 80, 40, 20, 15 and
10
meter bands (plus 15 MHz rx). Nice Cond, clean inside, good solder joins,
but only recieves various tones when tuning ????, Cost new $400 plus
building time, best off over $200, call 559-255-9110 or email



April 1st was nearly 3 months ago.

Typical troll response - showing his head is once again (or still?) up
his arse.


I quote from a contemporaneous response to you from another NG ...

"From your previous Childish Broadcasting (CB) into these NG,
it was inevitable that you would not have the mental capacity to recognise,
and partake in, a philosophical discussion for the edification of _REAL_
radio amateurs."

On 7/21/2014 10:00 AM, gareth wrote:
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
On 7/21/2014 5:17 AM, gareth wrote:
"Scott Smith" wrote in message
...
Heathkit SB-303 Receiver
Heathkit SB-303 Receiver, Excellant Cond, Covers the 80, 40, 20, 15 and
10
meter bands (plus 15 MHz rx). Nice Cond, clean inside, good solder joins,
but only recieves various tones when tuning ????, Cost new $400 plus
building time, best off over $200, call 559-255-9110 or email



April 1st was nearly 3 months ago.

Typical troll response - showing his head is once again (or still?) up
his arse.


I quote from a contemporaneous response to you from another NG ...

"From your previous Childish Broadcasting (CB) into these NG,
it was inevitable that you would not have the mental capacity to recognise,
and partake in, a philosophical discussion for the edification of _REAL_
radio amateurs."




Yep, and you're just as stoopid now as you were when you first posted it.

I suggest you go back to your Legos. They're more your speed.

And I've been a REAL radio amateur for over 45 years. How long have YOU
held your CB license?

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K

==================

"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...

Yep, and you're just as stoopid now as you were when you first posted it.
I suggest you go back to your Legos. They're more your speed.
And I've been a REAL radio amateur for over 45 years. How long have YOU
held your CB license?

Well, as suspected, your interjection into these threads owed more
to your needing attantion in an infantile manner than it did to your
contributing discourse in the manner of an adult.

Shame on you.

High time that you grew up, there, OM.

On 7/21/2014 10:07 AM, gareth wrote:
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...

Yep, and you're just as stoopid now as you were when you first posted it.
I suggest you go back to your Legos. They're more your speed.
And I've been a REAL radio amateur for over 45 years. How long have YOU
held your CB license?

Well, as suspected, your interjection into these threads owed more
to your needing attantion in an infantile manner than it did to your
contributing discourse in the manner of an adult.

Shame on you.

High time that you grew up, there, OM.



One thing you've again proven, Gareth - in a battle of intellects, you
are defenseless.

And you're too stoopid to understand that.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K

==================

"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
On 7/21/2014 10:07 AM, gareth wrote:
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
Yep, and you're just as stoopid now as you were when you first posted
it.
I suggest you go back to your Legos. They're more your speed.
And I've been a REAL radio amateur for over 45 years. How long have YOU
held your CB license?
Well, as suspected, your interjection into these threads owed more
to your needing attention in an infantile manner than it did to your
contributing discourse in the manner of an adult.
Shame on you.
High time that you grew up, there, OM.
One thing you've again proven, Gareth - in a battle of intellects, you
are defenseless.
And you're too stoopid to understand that.

"Well, as suspected, your interjection into these threads owed more
to your needing attention in an infantile manner than it did to your
contributing discourse in the manner of an adult."

QED

On 7/21/2014 11:44 AM, gareth wrote:
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
On 7/21/2014 10:07 AM, gareth wrote:
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
Yep, and you're just as stoopid now as you were when you first posted
it.
I suggest you go back to your Legos. They're more your speed.
And I've been a REAL radio amateur for over 45 years. How long have YOU
held your CB license?
Well, as suspected, your interjection into these threads owed more
to your needing attention in an infantile manner than it did to your
contributing discourse in the manner of an adult.
Shame on you.
High time that you grew up, there, OM.
One thing you've again proven, Gareth - in a battle of intellects, you
are defenseless.
And you're too stoopid to understand that.

"Well, as suspected, your interjection into these threads owed more
to your needing attention in an infantile manner than it did to your
contributing discourse in the manner of an adult."

QED




Yes, in a battle of intellects, you are defenseless.

No wonder the judge stopped you from wasting the court's time.

QED.


--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K

==================

On Mon, 21 Jul 2014, Jerry Stuckle wrote:

On 7/21/2014 5:17 AM, gareth wrote:
"Scott Smith" wrote in message
...
Heathkit SB-303 Receiver
Heathkit SB-303 Receiver, Excellant Cond, Covers the 80, 40, 20, 15 and 10
meter bands (plus 15 MHz rx). Nice Cond, clean inside, good solder joins,
but only recieves various tones when tuning ????, Cost new $400 plus
building time, best off over $200, call 559-255-9110 or email



April 1st was nearly 3 months ago.



Typical troll response - showing his head is once again (or still?) up
his arse.

But it's not clear what the story is on this. Elsewhere, he said he'd
just bought it, and was looking for tips on getting it working. Somewhere
else he was looking for filters for AM and CW. I thought one of the posts
was about getting it repaired, or tips on getting it going. Yet he's also
trying to sell it. Maybe he took too big a bite, buying it and then
realizing he's unable to repair it himself. But these posts are about
the same time, not a shift of thinking over time.

Michael

The SB-303 is a good receiver. I'd love to add it to my shack - but the
XYL would have a fit.


--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K

==================

"Michael Black" wrote in message
news:alpine.LNX.2.02.1407211008040.10123@darkstar. example.org...

But it's not clear what the story is on this.

To me, it was very clear right from the start. Someone trying to
sell an RX from 40 years ago, now worth only £50 or less, for the
new price, and hence my comment about an April hoax.

But yes, I would also give it house room.

On 7/21/2014 10:10 AM, gareth wrote:
"Michael Black" wrote in message
news:alpine.LNX.2.02.1407211008040.10123@darkstar. example.org...

But it's not clear what the story is on this.

To me, it was very clear right from the start. Someone trying to
sell an RX from 40 years ago, now worth only £50 or less, for the
new price, and hence my comment about an April hoax.

But yes, I would also give it house room.



Shows how little you know about the receiver. It's definitely worth at
least $200, even not working (but repairable).

But I guess since it doesn't receive 11 meters it's worthless to you.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle

==================