Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
High brightness LEDs?
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
For incandescent, yes. But not for LED bulbs. If that were the case, why would some LED bulbs be dimmable and others not? "is it dimmable" refers to the use of a phase-cut TRIAC dimmer in combination with a retrofit LED bulb designed to run on mains power. This combination does not work for all LED bulbs, because the electronics in the bulb are trying to put a constant current through the LED independent on the mains voltage, and now you are cutting down the mains power. (not even the voltage, really) You probably have a 13.8V stabilized DC supply in your shack. Can you use it as a variable-voltage supply by putting a dimmer in front of it? No, not really. When you turn down the dimmer, the supply will first try all it can do to keep the voltage at 13.8, and at some point it can not achieve that anymore and the voltage will drop, but it will not be stabilized anymore. Similarly, a LED bulb may keep constant light emission for a large part of the dimmer setpoint range, and at some point it goes down in intensity in an erratic way. We are just in the first phase of LED lighting deployment, the "compatability" phase where the bulbs are still using existing form factors of incandescent bulbs, and are supplied with mains voltage that is converted to current inside the bulb. It is not the best solution to use such bulbs in combination with existing dimmers. Of course a next phase will be to use more reasonable form factors and connection, where the electronics have a light level setpoint that determines the LED current and the mains voltage is directly applied without intermediate phase-cut dimmer. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
High brightness LEDs?
"Rob" wrote in message
... This combination does not work for all LED bulbs, because the electronics in the bulb are trying to put a constant current through the LED independent on the mains voltage Aah! I had not considered the possibility of further integration within the semiconductor of the LED. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
High brightness LEDs?
"gareth" wrote in message
... "Rob" wrote in message ... This combination does not work for all LED bulbs, because the electronics in the bulb are trying to put a constant current through the LED independent on the mains voltage Aah! I had not considered the possibility of further integration within the semiconductor of the LED. Clearly I'm behind the times, for all my LEDs are just that. In 1972 in my final year at Uni (electronics) I was drawing £3 per week for all living expenses, and £3 was the cost of an LED, and one of my contemporaries had special dispensation to include an LED in his 3rd year project! (STUDENT grant was £365, £1 per day, and tuition fees were paid) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
High brightness LEDs?
On 11/29/2014 4:30 AM, Rob wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote: For incandescent, yes. But not for LED bulbs. If that were the case, why would some LED bulbs be dimmable and others not? "is it dimmable" refers to the use of a phase-cut TRIAC dimmer in combination with a retrofit LED bulb designed to run on mains power. No, some bulbs are not dimmable, period. Some are. None work reliably with triac dimmer controls. This combination does not work for all LED bulbs, because the electronics in the bulb are trying to put a constant current through the LED independent on the mains voltage, and now you are cutting down the mains power. (not even the voltage, really) True - but non-dimmable bulbs do not work with other dimmers for the same reason. You probably have a 13.8V stabilized DC supply in your shack. Can you use it as a variable-voltage supply by putting a dimmer in front of it? Completely unrelated. The LED electronics and the power supply work completely differently. No, not really. When you turn down the dimmer, the supply will first try all it can do to keep the voltage at 13.8, and at some point it can not achieve that anymore and the voltage will drop, but it will not be stabilized anymore. Similarly, a LED bulb may keep constant light emission for a large part of the dimmer setpoint range, and at some point it goes down in intensity in an erratic way. Pretty much, yes. But that is true for any non-dimmable bulb with any dimmer. We are just in the first phase of LED lighting deployment, the "compatability" phase where the bulbs are still using existing form factors of incandescent bulbs, and are supplied with mains voltage that is converted to current inside the bulb. It is not the best solution to use such bulbs in combination with existing dimmers. Of course a next phase will be to use more reasonable form factors and connection, where the electronics have a light level setpoint that determines the LED current and the mains voltage is directly applied without intermediate phase-cut dimmer. There are already dimmers made for LEDs which work well. And there are commercial systems which use low voltage to drive the LEDs. But these are all proprietary; there are no standards for LED lighting yet. Eventually, maybe standards will be developed for the commercial market, but right now there is zero push for such standards. It's going to be years (if ever) before such standards are created for the residential market. There are too many reasons to stick with 117V wiring. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry, AI0K ================== |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
High brightness LEDs?
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 11/29/2014 4:30 AM, Rob wrote: Jerry Stuckle wrote: For incandescent, yes. But not for LED bulbs. If that were the case, why would some LED bulbs be dimmable and others not? "is it dimmable" refers to the use of a phase-cut TRIAC dimmer in combination with a retrofit LED bulb designed to run on mains power. No, some bulbs are not dimmable, period. Some are. None work reliably with triac dimmer controls. Maybe not in your world, but here we can buy TRIAC dimmers and LED bulbs that work together. You probably have a 13.8V stabilized DC supply in your shack. Can you use it as a variable-voltage supply by putting a dimmer in front of it? Completely unrelated. The LED electronics and the power supply work completely differently. Maybe your power supply, but mine is a switchmode supply and it works completely the same as any other. It is regulated for voltage, not for current, but that is another matter. There are already dimmers made for LEDs which work well. And there are commercial systems which use low voltage to drive the LEDs. But these are all proprietary; there are no standards for LED lighting yet. Eventually, maybe standards will be developed for the commercial market, but right now there is zero push for such standards. It's going to be years (if ever) before such standards are created for the residential market. There are too many reasons to stick with 117V wiring. LED is about current, not about voltage. A lighting system can put many LEDs in series and use a higher voltage. What is important is that the supply circuit gets separated from the bulb, so that it can be made dimmable, externally controlled, etc and the LED gets DC current supply. The mains here is 230V AC. There even are proposals to change that into 325V DC or even 500V DC. Not accepted proposals with a set date, but still. DC supply is more efficient for the home these days, now everthing uses switchmode supplies, it can transport more power with the same amount of copper and the same class of insulation. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
High brightness LEDs?
On 11/29/2014 10:12 AM, Rob wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote: On 11/29/2014 4:30 AM, Rob wrote: Jerry Stuckle wrote: For incandescent, yes. But not for LED bulbs. If that were the case, why would some LED bulbs be dimmable and others not? "is it dimmable" refers to the use of a phase-cut TRIAC dimmer in combination with a retrofit LED bulb designed to run on mains power. No, some bulbs are not dimmable, period. Some are. None work reliably with triac dimmer controls. Maybe not in your world, but here we can buy TRIAC dimmers and LED bulbs that work together. Maybe you THINK they work. But there are a number of problems (some of which I have identified in this thread) which show they don't work well together. You probably have a 13.8V stabilized DC supply in your shack. Can you use it as a variable-voltage supply by putting a dimmer in front of it? Completely unrelated. The LED electronics and the power supply work completely differently. Maybe your power supply, but mine is a switchmode supply and it works completely the same as any other. It is regulated for voltage, not for current, but that is another matter. Completely unrelated. The LED electronics and the power supply work completely differently. The first difference you are ignoring is your power supply is constant voltage. A LED power supply is constant current. They work on entirely different principles. There are already dimmers made for LEDs which work well. And there are commercial systems which use low voltage to drive the LEDs. But these are all proprietary; there are no standards for LED lighting yet. Eventually, maybe standards will be developed for the commercial market, but right now there is zero push for such standards. It's going to be years (if ever) before such standards are created for the residential market. There are too many reasons to stick with 117V wiring. LED is about current, not about voltage. A lighting system can put many LEDs in series and use a higher voltage. What is important is that the supply circuit gets separated from the bulb, so that it can be made dimmable, externally controlled, etc and the LED gets DC current supply. Sure they can be connected in series. But that has it's own problems; you can only go so far. And yes, the LED gets a DC supply - but it's the generation of the constant current source which causes the problems. Don't believe me, though. Look at some of the references I have posted - all written by EEs intimately familiar with the technology. The mains here is 230V AC. There even are proposals to change that into 325V DC or even 500V DC. Not accepted proposals with a set date, but still. DC supply is more efficient for the home these days, now everthing uses switchmode supplies, it can transport more power with the same amount of copper and the same class of insulation. That's fine for you. Personally, I don't expect it to get very far. But it's not going to happen here. Back in the 1800's, there was a current war. Nikola Tesla (supported by George Westinghouse) proposed using AC. Thomas Edison proposed using DC. Both had their advantages and disadvantages. AC won, obviously. And now, it is so ingrained into our economy there is no chance of changing. Although the utilities are building some long distance DC transmission lines. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry, AI0K ================== |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
High brightness LEDs?
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
Completely unrelated. The LED electronics and the power supply work completely differently. Maybe your power supply, but mine is a switchmode supply and it works completely the same as any other. It is regulated for voltage, not for current, but that is another matter. Completely unrelated. The LED electronics and the power supply work completely differently. The first difference you are ignoring is your power supply is constant voltage. A LED power supply is constant current. They work on entirely different principles. Constant voltage and constant current are not different principles. Linear and switchmode are. Sure they can be connected in series. But that has it's own problems; you can only go so far. And yes, the LED gets a DC supply - but it's the generation of the constant current source which causes the problems. What problems? Don't believe me, though. Look at some of the references I have posted - all written by EEs intimately familiar with the technology. When someone points you at a manufacturer that gets things right you question the truth... The mains here is 230V AC. There even are proposals to change that into 325V DC or even 500V DC. Not accepted proposals with a set date, but still. DC supply is more efficient for the home these days, now everthing uses switchmode supplies, it can transport more power with the same amount of copper and the same class of insulation. That's fine for you. Personally, I don't expect it to get very far. But it's not going to happen here. Of course not. You are living in the USA. There is no innovation in the USA. I would never expect something to be changed. Back in the 1800's, there was a current war. Nikola Tesla (supported by George Westinghouse) proposed using AC. Thomas Edison proposed using DC. Both had their advantages and disadvantages. AC won, obviously. At that time, AC had more advantages. Now, DC has. And now, it is so ingrained into our economy there is no chance of changing. The economy here works a bit differently. When new systems have advantages, they get deployed. Especially when they consume less energy. You know, we have (only) digital TV here. For nearly 10 years no. Something that will take years in the USA. Although the utilities are building some long distance DC transmission lines. There you are! A DC transmission line between here and Norway has been operating for several years. Windenergy parks at sea are also feeding DC. But at home it is even more of an advantage. E.g. to charge your electrical car you want as much power as possible, and at DC the same copper wire with the same insulation and safety concerns can transport 2-4 times more power. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
High brightness LEDs?
On 11/29/2014 10:41 AM, Rob wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote: Completely unrelated. The LED electronics and the power supply work completely differently. Maybe your power supply, but mine is a switchmode supply and it works completely the same as any other. It is regulated for voltage, not for current, but that is another matter. Completely unrelated. The LED electronics and the power supply work completely differently. The first difference you are ignoring is your power supply is constant voltage. A LED power supply is constant current. They work on entirely different principles. Constant voltage and constant current are not different principles. Linear and switchmode are. No, they operate on entirely different principles. Sure they can be connected in series. But that has it's own problems; you can only go so far. And yes, the LED gets a DC supply - but it's the generation of the constant current source which causes the problems. What problems? Please read back through my posts here. I'm not going to repeat myself. Don't believe me, though. Look at some of the references I have posted - all written by EEs intimately familiar with the technology. When someone points you at a manufacturer that gets things right you question the truth... What did they get right? Physics doesn't change based on the manufacturer. If you must know, Phillips is not considered one of the top brands in the U.S. The mains here is 230V AC. There even are proposals to change that into 325V DC or even 500V DC. Not accepted proposals with a set date, but still. DC supply is more efficient for the home these days, now everthing uses switchmode supplies, it can transport more power with the same amount of copper and the same class of insulation. That's fine for you. Personally, I don't expect it to get very far. But it's not going to happen here. Of course not. You are living in the USA. There is no innovation in the USA. I would never expect something to be changed. Oh no? ROFLMAO! Who do you think first developed LED bulbs? Here's a hint: it wasn't Phillips. Back in the 1800's, there was a current war. Nikola Tesla (supported by George Westinghouse) proposed using AC. Thomas Edison proposed using DC. Both had their advantages and disadvantages. AC won, obviously. At that time, AC had more advantages. Now, DC has. No, at the time neither had an advantage. You need to read up on the "war" between Tesla and Edison. And now, it is so ingrained into our economy there is no chance of changing. The economy here works a bit differently. When new systems have advantages, they get deployed. Especially when they consume less energy. You know, we have (only) digital TV here. For nearly 10 years no. Something that will take years in the USA. We have only digital TV here, also. Been that way for over 5 years. Although the utilities are building some long distance DC transmission lines. There you are! A DC transmission line between here and Norway has been operating for several years. Windenergy parks at sea are also feeding DC. But at home it is even more of an advantage. E.g. to charge your electrical car you want as much power as possible, and at DC the same copper wire with the same insulation and safety concerns can transport 2-4 times more power. We've had them for years, also. I don't know when they started, but utilities are still building them. Probably have been for 20-30 years, as semiconductors able to handle the power and voltage became available. We also have a lot of wind turbines - both at see and on land. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry Stuckle ================== |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
High brightness LEDs?
In rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors Jerry Stuckle wrote:
snip If you must know, Phillips is not considered one of the top brands in the U.S. Yeah, they must be trolls. snip Oh no? ROFLMAO! Who do you think first developed LED bulbs? Here's a hint: it wasn't Phillips. Hint: The Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) of 2007 authorized the Department of Energy (DOE) to establish the Bright Tomorrow Lighting Prize competition, known as the "L Prize". On 3 August 2011, DOE awarded the prize in the 60 W replacement category to a Philips' LED lamp after 18 months of extensive testing. snip No, at the time neither had an advantage. You need to read up on the "war" between Tesla and Edison. At the time there was no such thing as an effient DC-DC converter but transformers did exist; that was a HUGE advantage. snip We have only digital TV here, also. Been that way for over 5 years. Nope, we still have legacy analog in many places and that was the reason the FCC denied the petition to establish a 4M amateur band in the US. -- Jim Pennino |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
High brightness LEDs?
In rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 11/29/2014 4:30 AM, Rob wrote: Jerry Stuckle wrote: For incandescent, yes. But not for LED bulbs. If that were the case, why would some LED bulbs be dimmable and others not? "is it dimmable" refers to the use of a phase-cut TRIAC dimmer in combination with a retrofit LED bulb designed to run on mains power. No, some bulbs are not dimmable, period. Some are. None work reliably with triac dimmer controls. According to independant reviews by people NOT selling light bulbs, some manufacturers bulbs do. The ones you are selling do not. snip It's going to be years (if ever) before such standards are created for the residential market. There are too many reasons to stick with 117V wiring. The standards are being actively developed and have nothing to do with altering the wiring voltage and everything to do with dimmer and bulb technology. -- Jim Pennino |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT? Satellit 800 Alignment info or Display brightness mod | Shortwave | |||
LEDs | Shortwave | |||
Pulsing LEDs for higher efficiency | Homebrew | |||
Some Radio Pics LEDs | Shortwave | |||
FS Ad - Electronic Components including TIL311 Hex Displays - LEDs - TTL Chips | Homebrew |