Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Fred McKenzie wrote:
I suspect Suppressor Modulation may not be as bad as Scott thinks, or else the example given was done at a low power stage. It would have to be done at a low power stage, because when you are reducing the carrier, you're shifting current from the plate to the screen and the screen on most tubes is not really designed to sink much current. But even so, it would still require a tube with a hefty screen grid... the 6AU6 would not last very long in that service. I don't know how nonlinear it is, but I'm prepared to set up a jig on the bench and find out! --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Suppressor-grid modulation | Boatanchors | |||
Lightning suppressor? | Antenna | |||
FA: POLYPHASER IS-SB75F 75 OHM SURGE SUPPRESSOR | Equipment | |||
Control-grid modulation for AM | Homebrew | |||
Control-grid modulation for AM | Homebrew |