Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
As you may know, there's an SX-88 on Ebay. The pictures show it still
has the original paper capacitors like the 'Tiny Chiefs' and 'Black Beauties', which are known to become leaky. Should a valuable radio like the '88' be run with these caps' and possibly damage an irreplacable componant, such as an I.F. transformer? Would it lessen the value if it was recapped? -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On 4-Dec-2003, starman randomly pounded his keyboard and ended up generating: As you may know, there's an SX-88 on Ebay. The pictures show it still has the original paper capacitors like the 'Tiny Chiefs' and 'Black Beauties', which are known to become leaky. Should a valuable radio like the '88' be run with these caps' and possibly damage an irreplacable componant, such as an I.F. transformer? Would it lessen the value if it was recapped? IMHO you are the only one who can answer that question. There has been lots of debate over the value of keeping radios as original as possible vs.replacing the known bad components in order to make it useable. In my case, I use my radios which means they get repaired using currently available parts. There are others who fervently believe a rare unit such as this should be kept in as original condition as possible. By extension, this means the radio sits on a shelf and is preserved for future generations to appreciate. Both views are correct as different people have different values. You could, of course, go the route of stuffing new components into the old cases. I've done this on the electrolytics on an SX-28. But unless you are very talented, it may end up looking like... well, cut up parts that were glued back together. You could also cause more problems during re-capping by making mistakes and blowing something else up. I think we could all agree that you should NOT run the radio with the original Black Beauties in it. The rest is up for you to decide. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() PLEASE EXCUSE CAPS, SHORT REPLIES, STROKE Bill Turner, WA0ABI, 1117 Pike St., Saint Charles,MO 63301. Phone 636-949-2210 Plastic Dial covers, any size, any shape. $14.00 Glass Dial covers, 2" to 8 7/8" x 1/16" incr, $14.00 ELECTROLYTIC CAPACITORS, new, 7/8"DIA. X 3" OR 3 1/4" long, shiney red or blue cover, brown end seal, printed inscription down the length, metal mounting strap with a hole for mounting. 33uF-47uF 160 volts, $2.50 33 uF-33uF-33uF 160 volts $3.00 47 uF-47uF-47uF 160 volts $3.50 33uF -47uF 160 volts 47uF/100 $4.00 with bias cap. 33uF-47uF 94 uF/100 volts $4.00 (AC/DCbattery sets) 22uF-22uF 450 volts $4.00 (for AC sets) 22uF-22uF-22uF 450 volts $4.50 (for AC sets 10 uF 900 volts $6.00 HALLICRAFTERS S-38, A, B, C, D, E, $10.00 ZENITH T/O (can type) all except 7G605 $15.00 . ALL POSTAGE PAID,cashr, check, money order For a business SASE a copy of the Pocket Resouce Guide and my personal four page catalog of pieces, parts, and manuals. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "starman" wrote in message ... As you may know, there's an SX-88 on Ebay. The pictures show it still has the original paper capacitors like the 'Tiny Chiefs' and 'Black Beauties', which are known to become leaky. Should a valuable radio like the '88' be run with these caps' and possibly damage an irreplacable componant, such as an I.F. transformer? Would it lessen the value if it was recapped? In this case, I think a recapped radio would be less valueable. The people buying these things must think these things are more than just radios. So keeping the original capacitors in their original positions, with the original solder, etc. preserves the what -- nostalgia value? I noticed the pink Tiny Chiefs and the Black Beauties as well as the electrolytics, too. I'm sure the Hallicrafters engineers were well aware that the steel cased oil filled paper caps were more reliable. Frank Dresser |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frank Dresser wrote:
"starman" wrote in message ... As you may know, there's an SX-88 on Ebay. The pictures show it still has the original paper capacitors like the 'Tiny Chiefs' and 'Black Beauties', which are known to become leaky. Should a valuable radio like the '88' be run with these caps' and possibly damage an irreplacable componant, such as an I.F. transformer? Would it lessen the value if it was recapped? In this case, I think a recapped radio would be less valueable. The people buying these things must think these things are more than just radios. So keeping the original capacitors in their original positions, with the original solder, etc. preserves the what -- nostalgia value? I noticed the pink Tiny Chiefs and the Black Beauties as well as the electrolytics, too. I'm sure the Hallicrafters engineers were well aware that the steel cased oil filled paper caps were more reliable. Frank Dresser I am restoring a TS-382 Audio signal generator that is built with all bathtub cabs, and every one of them is bad. They were made with the same high acid paper that wax and molded capacitors were made with, they are just sealed in transformer oil. I am in the process of unsoldering the cans and replacing the caps inside with metal film capacitors I have to use a torch to heat the case and cover. There is a small vent hole that is soldered shut. You have to find it and remove the solder first, or it may blow hot solder on you when remove solder melts around the edge of the cover. Then I use a curved dental pick to lift the cover off while carefully heating the cover with a torch. I use a small drill press vice with smooth jaws to hold the can, and set it on a sheet of steel. (An old desktop PC case is good, because it has an open airspace under it.) When I started this I dug through my collection of NOS bathtubs, and most of them have high leakage as well. I did find one company who still makes new bathtub, and other oil filled caps, but I couldn't spend several hundred dollars for new caps for one project. -- 21 days! Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael A. Terrell wrote:
Frank Dresser wrote: "starman" wrote in message ... As you may know, there's an SX-88 on Ebay. The pictures show it still has the original paper capacitors like the 'Tiny Chiefs' and 'Black Beauties', which are known to become leaky. Should a valuable radio like the '88' be run with these caps' and possibly damage an irreplacable componant, such as an I.F. transformer? Would it lessen the value if it was recapped? I am restoring a TS-382 Audio signal generator that is built with all bathtub cabs, and every one of them is bad. Michael A's example shows just how unpredictable it is. Personally, if I could own an SX-88 I'd want to be able to experience it in top condition in all its glory...but I am not a "collector". The only set I have knowingly left bad caps in was a Volkempfanger DKE 38 that looks like it just rolled off the assembly line. Clearly its not going to be a daily "listener" and all the new caps in the world ain't gonna help it much. It does work, however. Ya never know...those caps could actually be GOOD in the SX-88 (snicker, snicker). If I did own an SX-88, and if the caps were bad, I'd certainly change them...and I'd restuff them...and I'd enjoy the radio. If my heirs have to take a $100 reduction in the value of the radio, tough for them. -Bill |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The only set I left bad caps in is my SX-28 because I was too chickensh*t to
go in that RF section! -- Brian Denley http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html "- - Bill - -" exray@coquidotnet wrote in message ... The only set I have knowingly left bad caps in was a Volkempfanger DKE 38 that looks like it just rolled off the assembly line. Clearly its not going to be a daily "listener" and all the new caps in the world ain't gonna help it much. It does work, however. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message ... I am restoring a TS-382 Audio signal generator that is built with all bathtub cabs, and every one of them is bad. They were made with the same high acid paper that wax and molded capacitors were made with, they are just sealed in transformer oil. I am in the process of unsoldering the cans and replacing the caps inside with metal film capacitors I have to use a torch to heat the case and cover. There is a small vent hole that is soldered shut. You have to find it and remove the solder first, or it may blow hot solder on you when remove solder melts around the edge of the cover. Then I use a curved dental pick to lift the cover off while carefully heating the cover with a torch. I use a small drill press vice with smooth jaws to hold the can, and set it on a sheet of steel. (An old desktop PC case is good, because it has an open airspace under it.) Steel bath tub caps have been pretty reliable for me. Certainly more reliable than paper or electolytic caps. I've got the chassis out of my S-36, and I'll check those steel caps carefully. When I started this I dug through my collection of NOS bathtubs, and most of them have high leakage as well. I did find one company who still makes new bathtub, and other oil filled caps, but I couldn't spend several hundred dollars for new caps for one project. -- 21 days! Michael A. Terrell Central Florida I only have a few NOS steel caps in my collection. I checked them a couple of years ago, and they were good. Anyway, oil filled steel caps were more reliable than paper caps and electrolytics in the mid 50s and were the usual choice with cost is no object equipment. Frank Dresser |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Frank Dresser" writes: Anyway, oil filled steel caps were more reliable than paper caps and electrolytics in the mid 50s and were the usual choice with cost is no object equipment. When I got my Collins R-388 (51J3), the AVC was bad. I was surprised when I traced it to a very leaky steel bathtub cap -- I thought those mil-spec babies never went bad. I left the cap in place a wired a replacement on top of it (not beautiful, but easily "restored" to "original"). I still wouldn't go thru a radio and just replace every metal bathtub cap, the way you would the wax firecrackers or Black Uglies. If I somehow found an SX-88, I would insist on using it, often -- so would recap it and enjoy. My widow will still get her $10 for it either way. --Mike K. Oscar loves trash, but hates Spam! Delete him to reply to me. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mike Knudsen" wrote in message
... I was surprised when I traced it to a very leaky steel bathtub cap -- I thought those mil-spec babies never went bad. I left the cap in place a wired a replacement on top of it (not beautiful, but easily "restored" to "original"). I had the same experience when restoring my 2nd Scott 800B6. Someone alerted me during that project that some bathtubs are in fact paper caps, not oil-filled, and you can't really tell the difference by staring at them. I tested them and sure enough, they were leaky as heck. I wired replacements around the original bathtubs, as Mike describes. One of these days, I should go back through my 1st 800B6 and check the bathtubs that I left untouched, on the assumption that they were "just fine." Phil Nelson Phil's Old Radios http://antiqueradio.org/index.html |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Wizard Radio in Seven Corners, VA, to receive WHFS in Annapolis-followup | Antenna | |||
What Exactly is a Radio Wave? | Antenna | |||
How to connect external antenna to GE Super Radio III | Antenna | |||
Review: Amateur Radio Companion 3rd Edition | Antenna | |||
Vintage radio books for sale | Boatanchors |