Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "geojunkie" wrote in message om... This SX-101a is my first HAM-only receiver, and has some features new to me such as a product detector. I have spent many hours recapping and aligning it, and pretty much all is well, but I have questions about what is "normal" for this unit: For AM reception you must listen to either the upper or lower sideband, unlike my SX-71. I notice that no matter where the selectivity is set (2,3 or 5 khz) that I must retune when switching between sidebands. It is like the spread of the side band oscillator crystals is a bit wider that the selectivity. I must tune lower up a bit or upper down. Is this normal? If not, how can I close this gap a bit? I notice that the S/N ratio seems poor. There is always a lot of background rush (kinda like white noise) compared to the SX-71. The alignment process makes no reference as to what is normal. Even with antenna terminals shorted there is still some noise, not insignificant. How can I measure to see if this is within spec, and if not, what might be the culprits? Do the signals really jump out of the backround noiise, or does it seem like the radio is half deaf? I don't know the SX-101, but in general, a very sensitive radio might very well have a significant amount of backround noise. Of course, if the sensitivity seems low, you will have to do some basic troubleshooting. The RF amp and the mixer are the main suspects. Be sure you didn't miswire anything when you recapped it. I'd like to say such things never happen, but I miswired a ratio detector after I fixed a bad connection at it's internal mica cap a couple of days ago. I could not get 15 meter band to align... no matter how slug and trimmer were adjusted I could not get the full bandspread as shown on the dial. All other bands were fine. What might I look for to correct this? I set 21.3mhz right on but both ends come up short of dial setting. The oscillator may be on the wrong side of the signal. If it's above the signal, try setting it below the signal. Or vice versa. Don't expect the oscillator to be on the same side of the signal as the other bands. BTW, for now my antenna is a 10ft wire, but that is what I was using on the SX-71 which is my only comparison reference. Perhaps the 101 needs more antenna to sound good??? Any and all advice appreciated as always. Dan Again, I don't know the 101, but I'd expect it to be considerably more more sensitive than the run of the mill Hallicrafters radios such as the S40A, which will start to work with a clip lead on the antenna terminal. Frank Dresser |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Antenna building questions | Antenna | |||
Newbie, UHF antenna for TV questions | Antenna | |||
Extra Class License Study Material | Antenna | |||
Auto Ant. Tuner Questions | Antenna | |||
BEWARE SPENDING TIME ANSWERING QUESTIONS HERE (WAS Electronic Questions) | Antenna |