Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
AComarow wrote:
But it does raise the interesting question: what in your opinion was the best-looking communications receiver ever produced? Brian's not eligible to vote, because he's wrong. ![]() The R-390, of course. Not the R-390A. The original R-390. But I'm biased. -- Want an abuse desk to be part of the solution? Dip it in acid. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
AComarow wrote:
We're all biased, Mike. We just believe our individual biases are the right ones. And speaking of biases, I like the 390, too. Still...impressive, yes. Functional, yes. But "best looking"? Others? Avery W3AVE SX-115! -Bill M |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: -Bill- exray@coquidotnet
Date: 1/12/04 9:01 PM Eastern Standard Time SX-115! -Bill M I understand the appeal, but it's always left me cold. Arrogant. ("Why am I so much more expensive than other ham receivers? Because I CAN be! Nyah, nyah.") Avery W3AVE |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
AComarow wrote:
SX-115! -Bill M I understand the appeal, but it's always left me cold. Arrogant. ("Why am I so much more expensive than other ham receivers? Because I CAN be! Nyah, nyah.") Avery W3AVE I got mine for $100 in the eighties so I try not to let current prices bother me :-) -Bill |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: -Bill- exray@coquidotnet
Date: 1/13/04 7:51 PM Eastern Standard Time Message-id: AComarow wrote: SX-115! -Bill M I understand the appeal, but it's always left me cold. Arrogant. ("Why am I so much more expensive than other ham receivers? Because I CAN be! Nyah, nyah.") Avery W3AVE I got mine for $100 in the eighties so I try not to let current prices bother me :-) -Bill Give you $150 for it. Avery |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
AComarow wrote:
I got mine for $100 in the eighties so I try not to let current prices bother me :-) -Bill Give you $150 for it. Avery I know you will! -Bill |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|