Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:
Chuck Harris wrote:


So, tell me, why do you feel so threatened that you need to announce
to the world (that is the audience here) that you are armed and looking
for a fight?

There was nothing in my post that could possibly make a literate person
believe I was planning to burglarize *your* home, and yet your first
instinct was to thump your chest and warn off all potential intruders.


Where did I say I was looking for a fight?

Right he


If I go into your house and steal all of your belongings, and then
give them to Goodwill, out of the goodness of my heart, then it's
ok, right?


If you think you can get past the .44 magnum, go ahead.

You are challenging me to burglarize your house so you can try and
shoot me.

My hypothetical question, shown above was an attempt to help you to
understand that it doesn't matter whether or not a thief sells, or
gives away stolen property, a crime has still occurred.

.... and I don't feel threatened,
you come burglarizing my home and you are the one looking for a fight
and will certainly feel threathened. You are the one who brought it up,
not me.

I brought up the hypothetical question because you seemed to have missed
an important moral lesson in your upbringing. I hoped that a simple
example, that most anyone would understand, would help you to the see
the parallel between giving away stolen property, and selling stolen
property (hint, the word stolen says it all).

It would appear that there were a few more lessons missed.

Good luck with your life,

-Chuck

Chuck Harris wrote:
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:

Chuck Harris wrote:


So, tell me, why do you feel so threatened that you need to announce
to the world (that is the audience here) that you are armed and looking
for a fight?

There was nothing in my post that could possibly make a literate person
believe I was planning to burglarize *your* home, and yet your first
instinct was to thump your chest and warn off all potential intruders.



Where did I say I was looking for a fight?


Right he


If I go into your house and steal all of your belongings, and then
give them to Goodwill, out of the goodness of my heart, then it's
ok, right?


If you think you can get past the .44 magnum, go ahead.

You are challenging me to burglarize your house so you can try and
shoot me.

Get a life chuckie, I in no way was 'challenging' you to burglarize my
home, you are the one that first mentioned burglarizing. I simply said
if you do, then be prepared to face the consenquences.


My hypothetical question, shown above was an attempt to help you to
understand that it doesn't matter whether or not a thief sells, or
gives away stolen property, a crime has still occurred.

And as I said, as long as it remains hypothetical, then you have nothing
to worry about.

Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:
Chuck Harris wrote:

Right he


If I go into your house and steal all of your belongings, and then
give them to Goodwill, out of the goodness of my heart, then it's
ok, right?


If you think you can get past the .44 magnum, go ahead.

You are challenging me to burglarize your house so you can try and
shoot me.


Get a life chuckie, I in no way was 'challenging' you to burglarize my
home, you are the one that first mentioned burglarizing. I simply said
if you do, then be prepared to face the consenquences.

No, you said if I think I can get past your 44 magnum, go ahead.

That is a challenge.


My hypothetical question, shown above was an attempt to help you to
understand that it doesn't matter whether or not a thief sells, or
gives away stolen property, a crime has still occurred.


And as I said, as long as it remains hypothetical, then you have nothing
to worry about.

I never worry about people who tell me what violent things they are going
to do to me. That is usually just bravado from cowards spouting off. The
ones I worry about more are those that plot in silence.

-Chuck

Chuck Harris wrote:
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:

Chuck Harris wrote:


Right he


If I go into your house and steal all of your belongings, and then
give them to Goodwill, out of the goodness of my heart, then it's
ok, right?


If you think you can get past the .44 magnum, go ahead.

You are challenging me to burglarize your house so you can try and
shoot me.



Get a life chuckie, I in no way was 'challenging' you to burglarize my
home, you are the one that first mentioned burglarizing. I simply said
if you do, then be prepared to face the consenquences.


No, you said if I think I can get past your 44 magnum, go ahead.

That is a challenge.

Only if *you* make it a challenge. I just stated what would happen if
you were to actually carry out your hypothetical question.


My hypothetical question, shown above was an attempt to help you to
understand that it doesn't matter whether or not a thief sells, or
gives away stolen property, a crime has still occurred.



And as I said, as long as it remains hypothetical, then you have
nothing to worry about.


I never worry about people who tell me what violent things they are going
to do to me.

As long as you don't do something to warrent those violent things, then
you have nothing to worry about.

That is usually just bravado from cowards spouting off.

Anyone who should attempt to break into my home and I am there, will
find out for sure. That isn't hypothetical, that is a fact.

Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:

Chuck Harris wrote:

Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:

Chuck Harris wrote:




Anyone who should attempt to break into my home and I am there, will
find out for sure. That isn't hypothetical, that is a fact.

Take it to private e-mail, gunslingers. This has gotten tiresome for
the rest of us.

-Bill.

-exray- wrote:
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:

Chuck Harris wrote:

Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:

Chuck Harris wrote:





Anyone who should attempt to break into my home and I am there, will
find out for sure. That isn't hypothetical, that is a fact.


Take it to private e-mail, gunslingers. This has gotten tiresome for
the rest of us.

You speak for the entire group? Wow! That must cause you a lot of stress!

Ain't no gunslingers here sheriff. Just a couple of wannabes, and my sorry
self.

-Chuck