Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lazy Senior wrote:
William Thanx for the info. It seems like most hams I work on AM that use amps are using linear amps, but much to my surprise there are many here in this group that are against using linears. Lazy (yes) Senior (yes) Well, you can go either way, but linears are simpler, self-contained, easy to service, and they help keep the room warm. High level plate modulation was "The way to go" before the FCC switched to measuring output power instead of input, and I understand why some hams would want to use Class C finals and high level modulation, since that's the best way to get the most efficiency out of a 1 KW input rig. Now that we measure output power, I don't feel that the added hardware and maintenance of using high-level modulation is justified. Others may disagree. My attitude is "If it isn't fun, stop doing it" - this is a _hobby_, but somehow a few hams never get the word. If having a "big iron" rig is what turns you on, go for it. If you want to maximize efficiency and homebrew a rig from scratch, there are Class E designs available using computer components to good effect. If you're interested in a smaller footprint and interoperability with SSB or other modes that need linears, then a linear is a practical alternative. FWIW. William -- William Warren (Filter noise from my address for direct replies) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Old Xmtrs, "Ancient Modulation" and Amps | Boatanchors |