Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott Dorsey wrote:
Chuck Harris wrote: The Swan design was very competent, but very much driven by cost. That said, it is sort of odd that they used the fancy, but expensive, 7360 balanced modulator tube. That's the sheet-beam tube? Those things actually reduced the cost of a design because they eliminated a whole slew of parts. Later on there were a bunch of cheap ones designed for chroma detectors in TV sets, but at first there was only one. --scott I've only heard of them being used because of their extremely good carrier suppression. They provide on the order of 60dB of carrier suppression, as compared to a typical balanced modulator which gives only 30dB. When used in conjunction with a crystal, or mechanical filter, the 7360 can achieve 80dB of carrier suppression. I can see that they would provide some reduction in parts, they are capable of oscillating, but Swan didn't use it that way. I think they could have achieved a greater cost savings using 4 matched diodes in a ring modulator configuration. -Chuck |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: Swan stuff | Swap | |||
Loop antenna question | Shortwave | |||
FS: Swan WM-2000 Wattmeter and Parting Out Swan 500C | Boatanchors | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |