Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/15/06 10:23 PM, in article
et, "COLIN LAMB" wrote: The SX-100 is a classic radio. Same basic design as the SX-88 - and much slimmer. It actually fits nicely on a shelf that is not too deep. It uses the 50 kHz if strip and has great selectivity. If there were only a few receivers around, it might be a very valuable receiver. But, it is fairly common. The demand is higher than on the SX-101, so the price will normally be a slight bit higher that for the SX-101. In terms of performance, the SX-101 is a ham band only SX-100, with more mechanical stability. Mechanical stability on the SX-100 is terrible, thanks to the otherwise wonderful gear drive system. On 15 meter cw, with full selectivity, you can drop a pencil on the desk and lose the station. Nevertheless, it is a classic radio. I bought one in excellent condition, with a nice Hallicrafters speaker for $100. Also bought a basket case SX-100 for $35. How someone else spends their money is their business. Colin K7FM Yes it is their business, but we are entitled to comment if we wish. I was dumb enough to buy an SX-100 new, and it was so mechanically unstable I couldn't use a key or bug on the same table as the receiver. I sold it as soon as I could afford a different receiver; an RME if I recall correctly. The SX-100 was junk in the 60s and it's junk now. Don |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 08:41:33 -0800, Don Bowey
wrote: On 1/15/06 10:23 PM, in article . net, "COLIN LAMB" wrote: The SX-100 is a classic radio. Same basic design as the SX-88 - and much slimmer. It actually fits nicely on a shelf that is not too deep. It uses the 50 kHz if strip and has great selectivity. If there were only a few receivers around, it might be a very valuable receiver. But, it is fairly common. The demand is higher than on the SX-101, so the price will normally be a slight bit higher that for the SX-101. In terms of performance, the SX-101 is a ham band only SX-100, with more mechanical stability. Mechanical stability on the SX-100 is terrible, thanks to the otherwise wonderful gear drive system. On 15 meter cw, with full selectivity, you can drop a pencil on the desk and lose the station. Nevertheless, it is a classic radio. I bought one in excellent condition, with a nice Hallicrafters speaker for $100. Also bought a basket case SX-100 for $35. How someone else spends their money is their business. Colin K7FM Yes it is their business, but we are entitled to comment if we wish. I was dumb enough to buy an SX-100 new, and it was so mechanically unstable I couldn't use a key or bug on the same table as the receiver. I sold it as soon as I could afford a different receiver; an RME if I recall correctly. The SX-100 was junk in the 60s and it's junk now. Don I had a low-end National SW-54 as my first receiver. You could breath on it and lose a CW station. I ended up getting one of the little ARC-5 surplus receivers; bought it for $5, made it work on 100-v.AC for another $20; you could bang on it with your fist, and the CW stayed rock steady. I lost that little receiver sometime in the 70s, much to my dismay... The SX-100 went for $1700 and change on eBay... An unbuilt Heathkit 2060 tuner went for $545; I was beat out by ten bucks. Damn. bob k5qwg |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
203 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (27-NOV-04) | Shortwave | |||
197 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (23-NOV-04) | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1402 Â June 25, 2004 | Policy | |||
214 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (09-APR-04) | Shortwave | |||
209 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (04-APR-04) | Shortwave |