Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Steven P. Burrows" wrote:
The B+ voltage delivered by the new transformer is about 50 volts higher than Hallicrafters' original spec., which I was advised was not a big problem. The other secondaries for the tube filaments and rectifier filament were exactly right. Throughout my use of this restored S-40B, I have been running it off of a personal computer grade surge suppressor power strip, along with my other old radios (others are solid state). I replaced the power supply electrolytic caps with new ones, so I doubt that this was a problem. From past experience with arcing in the rectifier tube, I also looked into this possible cause. My rectifier tube was also OK. I pulled all of the tubes from the radio and powered it up in a darkened room to attempt to see any potential arcing under the chassis. The fuse blew, and there was no visible evidence of any problems in the radio wiring. Next I disconnected the secondaries of the power transformer from the radio entirely. The fuse still blew. Next I removed the safety filter capacitors from the transformer primary circuits. Fuse still blew. I traced out the primary circuit with a DVM and found no short circuits in my wiring or from the transformer windings to each other or to the transformer frame. With the transformer completely taken out of the radio the fuse blowing stopped. I was forced to conclude that the "new" transformer was a dud. I don't have access right now to a variac, but I suspect that there might be some sort of arcing in the transformer that doesn't show up until higher voltages are applied. I still have this transformer, and I might try looking at it again later this year when I can borrow a variac from the university where I work. I have replaced the suspect transformer and so far the radio is working fine. My interest in using inrush current limiters is motivated by trying to avoid a repeat of a damaged transformer, both in my father's S-40B or my own. In spite of having a fancy microprocessor based Sony SW-77 to do my SWLing on, I find using this old 'boatanchor' type radio irresistible. After I finish up grad school (which I am starting rather late in life - age 46) I plan to go for a ham license and possibly look into using other BA gear. If the B+ is higher, the current load on the transformer goes up, too. That higher current on the HV winding may have been more than the transformer was built for. -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Antenna | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Equipment | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy (*sigh*) | Antenna | |||
Smith Chart Quiz | Antenna |