| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jake Brodsky" wrote in message ... The beauty of digital broadcasting is that it works better overall in a wider variety of conditions and the radio doesn't have to be outrageously large, heavy, expensive, or high maintenance. Weird claims. Digital broadcasting does not affect the size, weight, or maintenance of a radio. It may increase the price. The digital signal is certainly is more fragile than AM. Analog AM smoothly fades into the interference and noise - digital quits. In fact digital may increase the weight of a battery-powered radio because of the current drain of the digital processing chips - at least in early versions. The size of a radio is determined largely by how good you want it to sound. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| APS 13 DX Antenna with a good 70s tuner | General | |||
| FS: Repost, Pro-96 Digital/ Kenwood TH22AT | Equipment | |||
| FS: Repost, Pro-96 Digital/ Kenwood TH22AT | General | |||
| Rare Books on Electronics and Radio and Commmunications | Equipment | |||
| Rare Books on Electronics and Radio and Commmunications | Equipment | |||