Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Christopher C. Stacy wrote:
I don't understand what the problem is. Can't you just choose not to select those (clearly marked) articles for reading? I would not characterize this as a "problem." It's a constructive suggestion to improve Airwaves. Two issues: I read Airwaves via digest form, not individual Usenet articles (if it's even still on Usenet). Regardless, while I *can* scroll past postings via the digest in which I'm not interested (which I regularly do on many lists I receive), doing so is inconvenient when the individual posts are as lengthy as these two regulars are (often 1/3 or 1/4 of an entire digest for just one of them - see forthcoming remark about bandwidth). I spend enough time reading the info I *want to* read on the many lists to which I subscribe; I don't need to waste time downloading and sifting through extended postings that are better left to their own sites or mailing lists. #2: It's rude to more or less hijack Airwaves with these posts and the like when the postings are as long and as regular as these two examples are. If a single one-off on-topic post is contributed by someone, that's not a concern. However, it's a waste of bandwidth to repeatedly, week after week, post long playlists and scripts to a forum like Airwaves, which is not a playlist or script repository. There are alternative and more effective methods to distribute the entire volume of information contained in these posts. Spam is really only a problem if it's overwhelming, or unmarked. I didn't suggest the ARRL and WCBN posts are spam. I do, however, believe it is inappropriate to regularly post *lengthy* playlists and program scripts to an emailed listserv when (IMO) the courteous and practical method to share the info is to simply post a URL where interested readers can find detailed information. Airwaves can certainly be used to post some headlines from the playlist or script accompanying the URL to offer an idea of what the updated script or playlist contains, but not the whole damn things. This is not a major earth-ending issue, but I think my suggestion is practical and courteous for readers. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
Administrivia: Crafting a Group Charter... | Broadcasting |