The 'original' License for certain "Minority Owned" Broadcasters were to SERVE
the 'under-served' Minority Community of a specific Media Market, and 'create'
"Diversity in Radio Broadcasting".

Where DO you people get this crap from?

No one has promised "to SERVE the 'under-served' Minority Community" as a
condition of a grant of an FCC license for almost three decades. Where have
you been?

Sid Schweiger wrote:
The 'original' License for certain "Minority Owned" Broadcasters were to SERVE
the 'under-served' Minority Community of a specific Media Market, and 'create'
"Diversity in Radio Broadcasting".

Where DO you people get this crap from?

No one has promised "to SERVE the 'under-served' Minority Community" as a
condition of a grant of an FCC license for almost three decades. Where have
you been?

Wouldn't it be nice if someone did, though? Combine that with the Fairness
Doctrine and hey, you might have radio worth listening to.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

pamthis (Sid Schweiger) wrote in message ...
The 'original' License for certain "Minority Owned" Broadcasters were to SERVE
the 'under-served' Minority Community of a specific Media Market, and 'create'
"Diversity in Radio Broadcasting".

Where DO you people get this crap from?

No one has promised "to SERVE the 'under-served' Minority Community" as a
condition of a grant of an FCC license for almost three decades. Where have
you been?


SS,

Hello, simply read their 'original' Application for the
Radio Station License. The Devil is in the Details ;-}

jtf ~ RHF

..

Hello, simply read their 'original' Application for the Radio Station License.
The Devil is in the Details ;-}

Thanks for ignoring what I wrote. The "original" application is irrelevant,
especially when programming promises were eliminated from license renewals 30
years ago.

Try paying attention next time.