Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12 Jun 2004 16:30:53 GMT, "David Eduardo"
wrote: Most stations don't care today about anything except their home metro groundwave coverage. Any damage in the secondary or skywave coverage areas is irrelevant. As an employee of one of several AM station owners, including CCU and Disney, involved in a battle over interference from stations in Northern Mexico, I beg to differ. We care a lot, and have joined in legal action to protect our signal. There is also some evidence that IBOC interference can affect home metro groundwave coverage of adjacent channel stations. Mark Howell |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New ham wants advice on a good 2m/440 HT for a first radio | Equipment | |||
APS 13 DX Antenna with a good 70s tuner | Equipment | |||
APS 13 DX Antenna with a good 70s tuner | Equipment | |||
WKMI sounds owful what's the problem? | Broadcasting | |||
Can Digital AM ever sound this good? | Broadcasting |