Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Daytime interference from WTOP's digital signal was found to be
"significant" at WARK's protected 0.50 mV/M contour, and "noticeable" at its 0.75 mV/M contour. Yet today, with noise and all, anything beyond the 5 mv/m contour is pretty useless. But what if you're in Nowheresville, Wyoming, and a few 5 mV/m AM signals are all you've got? Tough luck, I guess? The AM IBOC scheme is chronically myopic. Each station using it shall only be concerned with their own primary local coverage area. But what about when the skywaves kick in, and somebody else's "useless" secondary coverage area suddenly lands smack-dab in the middle of your primary coverage area? The middle of the band is a prime example. Here in NJ at night, there's 1000 from Chicago, 1010 from NYC, 1020 from Pittsburgh, 1030 from Boston, 1040 from Des Moines, 1050 from NYC, 1060 from Philly, 1080 from Hartford, 1090 from Baltimore, 1100 from Cleveland, 1110 from Charlotte, 1130 from NYC, 1140 from Richmond, 1170 from Wheeling, 1180 from Rochester, 1190 from NYC and/or Ft. Wayne, 1210 from Philly, and 1220 from Cleveland. Put IBOC on all of these stations at night, and the mutual destruction would be horrendous! Some have suggested that allowance of nighttime IBOC, if any, should be considered on the basis of whether two new AM broadcast signals, on either side of the IBOC station's carrier and with the same power level and signal pattern as the IBOC sidebands would have, would be allowed according to the current FCC allocation scheme. In other words, if WXYZ at 1000 kHz wanted to broadcast IBOC at night, it would be judged on the basis of whether it would be legal to create two new stations, 990 WXYZ-Lower and 1010 WXYZ-Upper, with the same power level and signal pattern as the IBOC sidebands of WXYZ would have. In most cases, the answer would be an emphatic NO. For a 50,000 watt station, the total power used by the IBOC sidebands is about 1500 watts. Split that in half, and that's about 750 watts on each sideband. So, could 710 WOR fire up a new 750-watt station on 700 kHz and another new 750-watt station on 720 kHz at night? Obviously, no -- the new 700 kHz "station" would violate the protection that is afforded to 700 WLW, and likewise the new 720 kHz "station" would walk all over 720 WGN. So, given the same parameters of operation, how could WOR's IBOC sidebands (which can hardly be called "In-Band, On-Channel") ever be allowed at night? iBiquity and the NRSC think they should be... but what's going to happen in the real world? Mark my words -- if there's one thing that's going to finally kill off AM radio entirely in North America, it's definitely going to be IBOC. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "WBRW" wrote in message ... Daytime interference from WTOP's digital signal was found to be "significant" at WARK's protected 0.50 mV/M contour, and "noticeable" at its 0.75 mV/M contour. Mark my words -- if there's one thing that's going to finally kill off AM radio entirely in North America, it's definitely going to be IBOC. You're preaching to the choir (or at least the priest sitting in the back of the sanctuary). Your analysis is dead-on, excepting that the Canadians determined long ago that AM was dying, and more recently, that FM should follow it into the grave as soon as it's reasonably possible. The U-S's actions will only expedite the patient's demise. Living in Pittsburgh, and as you mention KDKA (I used to work for them, at that), I can tell you that there were some winter mornings where WBZ's sidebands would blow the doors off of even the metro-grade signal....I hate to think what's going to happen when/if WBZ turns IBOC on at night. Then again, I don't really care. I gave up AM pretty much when the noise floor went to -10 on most channels. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- There must always be the appearance of lawfulness....especially when the law's being broken. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- For direct replies, take out the contents between the hyphens. -Really!- |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "WBRW" wrote in message ... Daytime interference from WTOP's digital signal was found to be "significant" at WARK's protected 0.50 mV/M contour, and "noticeable" at its 0.75 mV/M contour. Yet today, with noise and all, anything beyond the 5 mv/m contour is pretty useless. But what if you're in Nowheresville, Wyoming, and a few 5 mV/m AM signals are all you've got? Tough luck, I guess? Yep. Skywave AM is essentially dead. I have driven at night across Wyoming, from the NW down to the SE. There are FM signals everywhere. In the daytime, many areas have no AM signals, while you can get a minimum of several FMs. FM, especially after 80-90, has given nearly every part of the country multiple FM signals, including areas where there was no day AM coverage. Radio is essentially a local, single market medium. It is definitely treated that way by advertisers. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New ham wants advice on a good 2m/440 HT for a first radio | Equipment | |||
APS 13 DX Antenna with a good 70s tuner | Equipment | |||
APS 13 DX Antenna with a good 70s tuner | Equipment | |||
WKMI sounds owful what's the problem? | Broadcasting | |||
Can Digital AM ever sound this good? | Broadcasting |