LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #21   Report Post  
Old June 16th 04, 04:17 PM
Mark Howell
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 15 Jun 2004 05:42:55 GMT, Alan Freed wrote:

There is also some evidence that IBOC interference can affect home
metro groundwave coverage of adjacent channel stations.


But not much. I can listen to the 1050 in the Riverside market within 10
miles of the KTNQ 50 kw IBOC site.


I have to laugh at that (nothing personal, DE). More of this
selective "acceptable interference" while NAB Eddie and his thugs
continue their audacious lies about third adjacent LPFM.

LPFM is to Eddie what Weapons Of Mass Destruction are to George W.

Carry on.


You have a point. As far as I'm concerned the NAB is correct about
LPFM, and dead wrong about IBOC, especially AM IBOC. But whichever
side of the debate you take, they're being inconsistent.

Mark Howell

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New ham wants advice on a good 2m/440 HT for a first radio Bob Miller Equipment 2 September 7th 04 01:28 AM
APS 13 DX Antenna with a good 70s tuner DJboutit2 Equipment 0 January 8th 04 07:44 AM
APS 13 DX Antenna with a good 70s tuner DJboutit2 Equipment 0 January 8th 04 07:44 AM
WKMI sounds owful what's the problem? Robert L. Herman Broadcasting 45 January 4th 04 06:42 PM
Can Digital AM ever sound this good? WBRW Broadcasting 42 September 19th 03 08:58 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017