Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 15 Jun 2004 05:42:55 GMT, Alan Freed wrote:
There is also some evidence that IBOC interference can affect home metro groundwave coverage of adjacent channel stations. But not much. I can listen to the 1050 in the Riverside market within 10 miles of the KTNQ 50 kw IBOC site. I have to laugh at that (nothing personal, DE). More of this selective "acceptable interference" while NAB Eddie and his thugs continue their audacious lies about third adjacent LPFM. LPFM is to Eddie what Weapons Of Mass Destruction are to George W. Carry on. You have a point. As far as I'm concerned the NAB is correct about LPFM, and dead wrong about IBOC, especially AM IBOC. But whichever side of the debate you take, they're being inconsistent. Mark Howell |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New ham wants advice on a good 2m/440 HT for a first radio | Equipment | |||
APS 13 DX Antenna with a good 70s tuner | Equipment | |||
APS 13 DX Antenna with a good 70s tuner | Equipment | |||
WKMI sounds owful what's the problem? | Broadcasting | |||
Can Digital AM ever sound this good? | Broadcasting |