| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#5
August 14th 04, 05:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
"Rich Wood" wrote in message ... On 11 Aug 2004 06:11:29 GMT, (Sam Byrams) wrote: One can only hope that XMSirius (yeah, they'll merge, eight to five by 2006)will kill the market value of local stations so that people who want to do radio can afford to buy them. Ain't gonna happen. Even if XM and SIRIUS merge, they'll have only a fraction of the audience of terrestrial radio. The current subscriber count is less than 3 million and that's spread over 200+ channels. I'm not sure I agree with your count, Rich. I'm not disputing the subscriber number, but isn't it fair to say that anyone listening to any Sirius or XM program ISN'T listening to coventional radio. Thus, there's radio listening, and not-radio listening (XM and Sirius). Point being that it's of no particular significance as to WHAT program is being listened to, just that it's not radio. And using that criteria, 3 million subscribers equates to more than 1% of the U-S population - even more when considering only those who use radio. Isn't it fair to say that this, assumed to be uniformly distributed, also means that Sirius and XM (assuming all subscribers are listening at once...a big assumption, certainly) would be similar to an in-market radio station with a 1 share, a level that many stations in densely-served markets would consider to be a success? If this share grows by just one order of magnitude, it's going to start hurting traditional broadcasting. I believe it'll be many years before satellite radio becomes a significant threat to radio. It'll take even longer before ad agencies get the kind of numbers from the channels that accept advertising. Agencies have to buy on environment rather than buying buy the numbers, as they're used to doing. But Sirius' and XM's business model doesn't require advertisers....it's subscription, and the subscription model is more efficient than the advertiser-supported model (as XM seems to have found out). We don't got to show you any stinkin' ad agencies, and could care less what numbers they're looking for! I have both XM and SIRIUS. I generally listen to Classical, Jazz, Oldies and a few other non-commercial channels. That means I'm unreachable by advertisers. Except, you've noted, when you listen to NPR. And NPR's programming on Sirius does do underwriting announcements, too, you know. Not exactly being deluged with advertising matter, true, but it's still a far cry from being an advertiser-free zone. So considering how desireable NPR listeners are, it might just be the bleeding edge on where satellite "advertising" dollars starts seeping to. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- If there's nothing that offends you in your community, then you know you're not living in a free society. Kim Campbell - ex-Canadian Prime Minister - 2004 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- For direct replies, take out the contents between the hyphens. -Really!- Rich |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Deciding XM or Sirius ? Here's a review. | Broadcasting | |||
| wHATS BETTER sirius OR xm AND PRICING | Broadcasting | |||
| Review: Amateur Radio Companion 3rd Edition | Antenna | |||
| Review: Amateur Radio Companion 3rd Edition | Equipment | |||
| Review: Amateur Radio Companion 3rd Edition | Equipment | |||
Threaded Mode
