Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
"McWebber" wrote in message ... "Paul Anderson" wrote in message ... In article , http://HireMe.geek.nz/ wrote: Will the US CBS Network loose its broadcasting license over the Dan Rather row? CBS doesn't have "a" broadcasting license to "loose". They do own a number of stations, though, that have licenses. I doubt a journalistic mistake like this would cause someone to lose their license. What mistake? .... presenting fake documents as real in a news story. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
"R J Carpenter" wrote in message ... "Doug Smith W9WI" wrote in message ... There've been more than a few stations recently flagrantly & repeatedly running excessive power -- and still hold their licenses. I know of one station that operated on an unauthorized frequency, from an unauthorized site, with an unauthorized pattern and power, and significantly interfered with a major station for more that a year. Complaints to the FCC did no good. I know of two... WRHC in Miami (Coral Gables) and 106.5 in Culebra, PR, which was reassigned to 98.9 but built and ran on 106.5 anyway. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
"David Eduardo" wrote in message ... What mistake? ... presenting fake documents as real in a news story. There's some indication it wasn't a mistake ... and CBS knew that. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
"David Eduardo" wrote in message ... "McWebber" wrote in message ... "Paul Anderson" wrote in message ... In article , http://HireMe.geek.nz/ wrote: Will the US CBS Network loose its broadcasting license over the Dan Rather row? CBS doesn't have "a" broadcasting license to "loose". They do own a number of stations, though, that have licenses. I doubt a journalistic mistake like this would cause someone to lose their license. What mistake? ... presenting fake documents as real in a news story. If you'd been following the story, the source, Burkett, was the one responsible for the misrepresentation, as he claimed that he was "pressured" into providing the name of the source, for the purposes of determining provenance for the documents in question. This is appropriate journalistic practice. While CBS does hold some responsibility for failing to fully prove that Burkett's claims were true, the fault for the hoax lies fully with Burkett, who could have easily told the truth about the documents' source. Holding Rather and CBS solely responsible for this fiasco is like me holding you responsible for the lies we've been told by the Bush Administration. But then, I do. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- If there's nothing that offends you in your community, then you know you're not living in a free society. Kim Campbell - ex-Prime Minister of Canada - 2004 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- For direct replies, take out the contents between the hyphens. -Really!- |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Life is going to be hell for Viacom for the next 4 years if Bush is reelected. And well is should. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
On 21 Sep 2004 02:42:58 GMT, Mark Crispin
wrote: It will otherwise blow over. Being liberal means never having to say that you're sorry (or admit being wrong). I've noticed that trait among Conservatives, as well. FOX News isn't known for retractions. The trait appears to be universal. Rich |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
On 21 Sep 2004 17:36:52 GMT, "Steve" wrote:
Life is going to be hell for Viacom for the next 4 years if Bush is reelected. It just goes to show... that if you're going to attack the king, you'd better make sure to kill him. Nah. Just continue the political contributions and all will be well. Rich |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
On 21 Sep 2004 02:43:12 GMT, "Badger"
wrote: For what? All they admitted to was making a mistake. They apologized for that. So in today's Politically correct, all you have to do is say you're sorry world, everyone will forget in a week or so. Even if you don't say you're sorry everyone will forget in a week or so. Rich |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
On 20 Sep 2004 04:00:32 GMT, "http://HireMe.geek.nz/"
wrote: Will the US CBS Network loose its broadcasting license over the Dan Rather row? The FCC does not license networks. Rich |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
They need to worry about Bush sending the troops to the NBC
headquarters before worrying about their license. "http://HireMe.geek.nz/" wrote in message ... Will the US CBS Network loose its broadcasting license over the Dan Rather row? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|