Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "David Eduardo" wrote in message ... "McWebber" wrote in message ... "Paul Anderson" wrote in message ... In article , http://HireMe.geek.nz/ wrote: Will the US CBS Network loose its broadcasting license over the Dan Rather row? CBS doesn't have "a" broadcasting license to "loose". They do own a number of stations, though, that have licenses. I doubt a journalistic mistake like this would cause someone to lose their license. What mistake? ... presenting fake documents as real in a news story. If you'd been following the story, the source, Burkett, was the one responsible for the misrepresentation, as he claimed that he was "pressured" into providing the name of the source, for the purposes of determining provenance for the documents in question. This is appropriate journalistic practice. While CBS does hold some responsibility for failing to fully prove that Burkett's claims were true, the fault for the hoax lies fully with Burkett, who could have easily told the truth about the documents' source. Holding Rather and CBS solely responsible for this fiasco is like me holding you responsible for the lies we've been told by the Bush Administration. But then, I do. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- If there's nothing that offends you in your community, then you know you're not living in a free society. Kim Campbell - ex-Prime Minister of Canada - 2004 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- For direct replies, take out the contents between the hyphens. -Really!- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|