Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If there are any radcio listeners here in Kalamazoo listening.
Can someone tell me what the deal is with WNWN 98.5 broadcasting on 95.5 as well as it's regular frequency? I discovered this while searching the FM band this morning. I thought at first that it was the radio that I was using but when I turned on my large stereo system and punched in the duplicate frequency I found the same station on the big radio as well. So what's the deal? Is it my radios or are they going to put a new station in the 95.5 spot? TIA Robert |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert L. Herman wrote:
If there are any radcio listeners here in Kalamazoo listening. Can someone tell me what the deal is with WNWN 98.5 broadcasting on 95.5 as well as it's regular frequency? I discovered this while searching the FM band this morning. I thought at first that it was the radio that I was using but when I turned on my large stereo system and punched in the duplicate frequency I found the same station on the big radio as well. So what's the deal? Is it my radios or are they going to put a new station in the 95.5 spot? TIA Robert It's a translator/booster to improve the 98.5 signal in the downtown areas of Kalamazoo. I never had a problem hearing WNWN-FM in downtown Kalamazoo in the car, but it might be necessary to help penetration into some buildings. There is no way that they could put a full power station on 95.5. Charlie -- To respond by Email remove never- from address |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert L. Herman wrote:
Can someone tell me what the deal is with WNWN 98.5 broadcasting on 95.5 as well as it's regular frequency? I discovered this while searching the FM band this morning. I thought at first that it was the radio that I was using but when I turned on my large stereo system and punched in the duplicate frequency I found the same station on the big radio as well. So what's the deal? Is it my radios or are they going to put a new station in the 95.5 spot? http://svartifoss2.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/w...fac_num=145136 It's a new station, W238AL. The numbers in the call letters mean it's a "translator" station, authorized to rebroadcast the signals of some other station (in this case WNWN) but not to originate programs of its own. Apparently WNWN doesn't feel their 98.5 transmitter has a strong enough signal in some parts of the Portage area. -- Doug Smith W9WI Pleasant View (Nashville), TN EM66 http://www.w9wi.com |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert L. Herman wrote:
Can someone tell me what the deal is with WNWN 98.5 broadcasting on 95.5 as well as it's regular frequency? It's called a translator. W238AL to be exact. So what's the deal? Is it my radios or are they going to put a new station in the 95.5 spot? They can't. W238AL can only rebroadcast a full power station. In this case, it gives a better signal to the Kalamazoo area than the 98.5 main station. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "CA was in NJ" SHOT_ON_SIGHT wrote in message ... Robert L. Herman wrote: Can someone tell me what the deal is with WNWN 98.5 broadcasting on 95.5 as well as it's regular frequency? It's called a translator. W238AL to be exact. So what's the deal? Is it my radios or are they going to put a new station in the 95.5 spot? They can't. W238AL can only rebroadcast a full power station. In this case, it gives a better signal to the Kalamazoo area than the 98.5 main station. Is this, perhaps, to preempt the possibility of a LPFM? |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
R J Carpenter wrote:
Is this, perhaps, to preempt the possibility of a LPFM? Y'know, I've wondered about that... We have a couple of cases where Nashville stations have filed for translators at sites well within their city-grade contour and where no apparent terrain obstruction exists. -- Doug Smith W9WI Pleasant View (Nashville), TN EM66 http://www.w9wi.com |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
R J Carpenter wrote:
Is this, perhaps, to preempt the possibility of a LPFM? Not even close. First adjacent WBXX (class A) around 20 miles away would prevent that. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
CA was in NJ wrote:
R J Carpenter wrote: Is this, perhaps, to preempt the possibility of a LPFM? Not even close. First adjacent WBXX (class A) around 20 miles away would prevent that. Translator rules are weird. They can put up a 175 watt translator, but not a 100 watt LPFM. Charlie -- To respond by Email remove never- from address |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|