Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Scott Dorsey wrote:
In the US, ISDN was a flop because it was too expensive, too slow, and too late to market. If it had become available as quickly as it had in Europe and as universally, it would have been very popular. But it wasn't. (A) ISDN was faster than dialup - no one (hopefully) is claiming that it was meant to replace leased lines. (B) Yes, ISDN was expensive in some places. In Ohio we got lucky. Business ISDN was tarriffed per minute, but you could get residential for as little as $37/month for 75 calls/month (metered access, 8c/call after that) or about $45 flat rate. And I still maintain that ISDN was more useful for that time period than BPL will be now. **SJS (trying to tie this argument back into radio somehow, and failing miserably) -- JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, http://JustThe.net/ Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / PGP Key available from your friendly local key server (0xE3AE35ED) Apple Valley, California Nothing scares me anymore. I have three kids. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Voice of Switzerland prepares to bow out | Broadcasting | |||
Photos of China shortwave radios (and more!) | Equipment | |||
Photos of China shortwave radios (and more!) | Policy | |||
Antenna future | Antenna | |||
WHERE ARE ALL THE TOUGH GUYS IN THIS SHORTWAVE NEWSGROUP? | General |