Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Haberkost wrote:
"Scott Dorsey" wrote in message | In article , Al Quaglieri wrote: Overall, not much to disagree with except: | How about making the 87.9 MHz "Channel 200" available for them? Have a | very easy to get special event license, that is good for one year and needs | to be renewed. This is much like what is done in some European countries now. This was a disaster for the channel 6's affected. It's taken years of reallocating the stations licenced to fix it, once the genie got out of the bottle. And that was in the hands of ostensibly competent engineering talent....do you really think that LPFMs would be as likely to have such skills? My suspicion is that with the coming of HDTV that this will be much less of an issue. But I do agree with the technical concerns. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
197 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (23-NOV-04) | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1415 Â September 24, 2004 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1402 Â June 25, 2004 | Policy | |||
209 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (04-APR-04) | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 | General |