FAO Regulars
 

jim wrote:
DrDeath wrote:



remind me what AUK stands for as i must have missed that thread.
Alt.Usenet.Kooks AUK

FAO Regulars
 

Steveo wrote:

jim wrote:

DrDeath wrote:

"an old friend" wrote in message
egroups.com...


jim wrote:


Got pretty quiet here. The xposting ****s have succeded in polluting
this once fine ;) bastion of cb talk. Any comments?

they will get bored withi n a few days



Not as long as you remain on this group Mark.



Hi Dr Death and Jim.

hey double d, had the prick kf'ld thanx to your previous post with all
the addy's he has.


'An old tard' would have to be considered an irregular wouldn't he?

still want to see some of the older posters respond.
73, jim.


How old does a CBer have to be now-days? :)

lets see, i started bagging this ng in '97 and started posting a coupla
three years later using a dial up nic, so anytime after '00. age wise,
seeing some of the bucketmouths here, 14 hehehe

FAO Regulars
 

"jim" wrote in message
...
Got pretty quiet here. The xposting ****s have succeded in polluting this once
fine ;) bastion of cb talk. Any comments?

Yup, it sucks.

FAO Regulars
 

wrote in message
...
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:38:41 GMT, "Landshark"
wrote:


"jim" wrote in message
...
Got pretty quiet here. The xposting ****s have succeded in polluting
this once
fine ;) bastion of cb talk. Any comments?

Yup, it sucks.

concour bt it is the end result of years of effort by those that
isnist that another personas sexuality is weapon to use when you can't
beat their arguments

that and the tolerations of these tactics made the result only a a
matter of time

No, the result is brought to Usenet by you being a silly little ****tard,
moron.

FAO Regulars
 

U-Know-Who wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:38:41 GMT, "Landshark"
wrote:


"jim" wrote in message
...
Got pretty quiet here. The xposting ****s have succeded in polluting
this once
fine ;) bastion of cb talk. Any comments?

Yup, it sucks.

concour bt it is the end result of years of effort by those that
isnist that another personas sexuality is weapon to use when you can't
beat their arguments

that and the tolerations of these tactics made the result only a a
matter of time

No, the result is brought to Usenet by you being a silly little ****tard,
moron.
"****tard Moron" Tom that is part of the problem you can't address
people without throwing out sex laced insults

these tactics made only a matter of time before someone like the meow
folks (althought it is looking like there are about 2 of them under all
those nicks) to the NG but they will get bored soon enough

FAO Regulars
 

jim wrote:
Steveo wrote:

jim wrote:

DrDeath wrote:

"an old friend" wrote in message
egroups.com...


jim wrote:


Got pretty quiet here. The xposting ****s have succeded in polluting
this once fine ;) bastion of cb talk. Any comments?

they will get bored withi n a few days



Not as long as you remain on this group Mark.



Hi Dr Death and Jim.

hey double d, had the prick kf'ld thanx to your previous post with all
the addy's he has.


'An old tard' would have to be considered an irregular wouldn't he?

still want to see some of the older posters respond.
73, jim.


How old does a CBer have to be now-days? :)

lets see, i started bagging this ng in '97 and started posting a coupla
three years later using a dial up nic, so anytime after '00. age wise,
seeing some of the bucketmouths here, 14 hehehe

Gotcha. How old were you when you first used a CB radio?

FAO Regulars
 

jim wrote:
Steveo wrote:
jim wrote:

Got pretty quiet here. The xposting ****s have succeded in polluting
this once fine ;) bastion of cb talk. Any comments?


Hello Jim.

****s are a good description.

I've been kinda busy lately so I breeze through here and only open
posts from people I recognize, sorta like reading email. I'm trying to
get my barn ready for paint so that's been taking up most of my spare
time. (wtf is spare time?) :p

At any rate, nice to see you post again. Didja get your tower up yet?

i go to work to relax ;)

Ain't it the truth. :)

towers not up yet though i took out a 125 yr old double oak and 4
hickories in preperation.

I know you didn't like taking those trees down, but what's a mother to do?!

Good progress OM.

FAO Regulars
 

"U-Know-Who" wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:38:41 GMT, "Landshark"
wrote:


"jim" wrote in message
...
Got pretty quiet here. The xposting ****s have succeded in polluting
this once
fine ;) bastion of cb talk. Any comments?

Yup, it sucks.

concour bt it is the end result of years of effort by those that
isnist that another personas sexuality is weapon to use when you can't
beat their arguments

that and the tolerations of these tactics made the result only a a
matter of time

No, the result is brought to Usenet by you being a silly little ****tard,
moron.


Silly little ****tard's are on line one trying to distance themselves from
him..

FAO Regulars
 

"an old freind" wrote in message
oups.com...

U-Know-Who wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:38:41 GMT, "Landshark"
wrote:


"jim" wrote in message
...
Got pretty quiet here. The xposting ****s have succeded in polluting
this once
fine ;) bastion of cb talk. Any comments?

Yup, it sucks.

concour bt it is the end result of years of effort by those that
isnist that another personas sexuality is weapon to use when you can't
beat their arguments

that and the tolerations of these tactics made the result only a a
matter of time

No, the result is brought to Usenet by you being a silly little ****tard,
moron.
"****tard Moron" Tom that is part of the problem you can't address
people without throwing out sex laced insults

these tactics made only a matter of time before someone like the meow
folks (althought it is looking like there are about 2 of them under all
those nicks) to the NG but they will get bored soon enough


Oh no, you now have an entire group of kooks who love you now. You're
****ed, as are the groups you have now ****ed up. (sex laced verbiage
intended)

FAO Regulars
 

U-Know-Who wrote:
"an old freind" wrote in message
oups.com...


Oh no, you now have an entire group of kooks who love you now.
nope
You're
****ed,
if you want to use such langaige you have nothing to complain about
as are the groups you have now ****ed up. (sex laced verbiage
intended)
Nop the gruops YOU and your freind have spent YEARS ****ing up with
your sex laced verbiage

you kep using sexaulyas a weapon and you WILL keep this gruop from
having anything much to do with radio

it is your choice Tom