Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in
oups.com: Slow Code wrote: wrote in ups.com: wrote: On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 23:21:23 GMT, Slow Code wrote: wrote in roups.com: an old friend wrote: one class, all frequencies I hate that idea. I'm a 20wpm Extra and I don't want to share my sub-bands with retards. yep there at least you come out and admit you are ONLY interested in your own selfish interets Well slow code, the new users would be sharing them with you, IF you act nice. Remember, there would be more no subbands. I am very impressed with your 20wpm extra! I'm just a lowly 13 wpm advanced, not smart enough to get that extra mumbo -jumbo.................. I know you're much smarter than me. I will say this sincerely. Would you care to move this qso to 40 or 80 meters? I do mean CW,ofcourse. I'm a little on the rusty side and am still using my old vibroplex. But I'll be dam if I can't light a lucky strike and not miss a beat. And I don't copy with a ****ing computer either. It's in my head or when I was working it was copied with a manuel type writer.I can tell if a wuss is sending with a computer,humans can't send that perfect and KEYERS don't count! Now slow code what ya say? oh BTW, did I mention I worked at WCC for more years than I care to remember. You newer guys should look up WCC,,,,,,,,,,was pretty cool for it's time. Hey Slow Code ...........people could record it and even the no-coders could use there computers to watch me make an ass of you on the much loved CW mode! Well?? **** or get off the pot,blow-hard. Your license proposal sucks, but it probably sounds good to a drunk. All your proposal does is dumb down licensing standards. You like it because you get all allocations at once with one test. Your proposal is bad because there is no incentive to improve your skills and progress any further after passing the initial exam. Now pour yourself a few more drinks and mull over this before you pass out you lazy ass drunk, and don't post here again unless you're sober. The best proposal for amateur radio: 1: No more automatic renewals. Individuals must retest and pass all elements required for their license class. 2: The passing score for written exams needs to be raised to 85%. 3: Code elements should be 13 wpm for General, and 20 wpm for Extra. 4: Make the no-code license one year non-renewable. Hey slow code you didn't even comment on my idea to qsy to cw. I didn't think you would. You probably can't cpy ur own name at 5 wpm! LOL (hence "slow code") AND for those who don't want the simple easy to pass ham ticket, blanket license 25.000 through 27.995 for what ever, just limit the power to something where nothing was bothered or the op couldn't hurt themselves easily. Slow Code please stay just the way you are! You are one funny ****er!! I said don't post unless you're sober! Call AA! SC |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Slow Code wrote: wrote in oups.com: I said don't post unless you're sober! who are the nonexistant moderator? trolling right along |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
197 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (23-NOV-04) | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1415 Â September 24, 2004 | Broadcasting | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1402 Â June 25, 2004 | Broadcasting | |||
214 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (09-APR-04) | Shortwave | |||
209 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (04-APR-04) | Shortwave |