Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old September 26th 06, 01:33 PM posted to rec.radio.cb
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 985
Default Thought this was puzzling...

LeIand C. Scot wrote:
Tacking the diodes on to the case of the transistor works better than
attaching them to the heat sink due to the relatively slow thermal response,
the heat sink changes temperature slower than the cap on the transistor.


That's simply not true... while the heat sinks response might be a bit
slower... it's a much better indicator of the temp of the transistor
die. The ceramic cap on those transistors will overshoot the die temp
in both directions because of it's poor thermal contact with the die.

www.telstar-electronics.com

  #2   Report Post  
Old September 26th 06, 01:49 PM posted to rec.radio.cb
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 54
Default Thought this was puzzling...

On a sunny day (26 Sep 2006 05:33:33 -0700) it happened "Telstar Electronics"
wrote in
.com:

LeIand C. Scot wrote:
Tacking the diodes on to the case of the transistor works better than
attaching them to the heat sink due to the relatively slow thermal response,
the heat sink changes temperature slower than the cap on the transistor.


That's simply not true... while the heat sinks response might be a bit
slower... it's a much better indicator of the temp of the transistor
die. The ceramic cap on those transistors will overshoot the die temp
in both directions


This is not correct. there is no 'overshoot' in temp possible.
Unless you know how to heat solder to 250C with a 200C soldering iron?
An other Telstar miracle ;-)?
The thermal response will be faster, resulting in better protection.
A slower response could result in reducing current too late.
  #3   Report Post  
Old September 26th 06, 02:04 PM posted to rec.radio.cb
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 985
Default Thought this was puzzling...

Jan Panteltje wrote:
This is not correct. there is no 'overshoot' in temp possible.
Unless you know how to heat solder to 250C with a 200C soldering iron?
An other Telstar miracle ;-)?
The thermal response will be faster, resulting in better protection.
A slower response could result in reducing current too late.


You're right... overshoot was the wrong word. I think you knew what I
meant... but if you didn't... I'll clarify. There is no friggin' way...
having a sensing device on the ceramic cap of those transistors tracks
the die temp as good as having that same tracking device in close
proximity on the geat sink.

www.telstar-electronics.com

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Poorp Robeson ention his name and he must show up to answer even thought he posts hardly a word of truth an old friend Policy 19 August 30th 06 11:57 PM
ah I thought we wereto going to have some devine wisdom shared by Isis himself an_old_friend Policy 0 May 21st 06 04:44 PM
And You Thought You'd Seen It All David Stinson Boatanchors 2 May 19th 04 12:12 AM
Just when you thought you had all this figured out John F. Grimes Homebrew 6 August 5th 03 07:54 PM
Just when you thought you had all this figured out John F. Grimes Homebrew 0 August 2nd 03 09:25 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017