On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 22:38:32 +0000, Slow Code wrote:

None,

They complain about it being dark and wait for a republican to do it.

They accomplish this task by contracting Haliburtian to pile up dead US
solders to reach the light bulb made by GE. Due to this huge expense, they
pass more tax cuts for rich republicans so nobody (who counts) is hurt
financially. Everybody's a winner! Right?

"Barnard Peters" wrote in message
newsan.2006.10.04.05.40.06.32926@blueplanet...
On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 22:38:32 +0000, Slow Code wrote:

None,

They complain about it being dark and wait for a republican to do it.

They accomplish this task by contracting Haliburtian to pile up dead US
solders to reach the light bulb made by GE. Due to this huge expense, they
pass more tax cuts for rich republicans so nobody (who counts) is hurt
financially. Everybody's a winner! Right?
=
Heck. Maybe The Slickster and Janet could have used Halliburton to rebuild
the World Trade Center the first time it was bombed. Or, and get this...how
about if Halliburton would have rebuilt the USS Cole? Or the Marine barracks
in Lebanon?
I bet a little bit of that Halliburton money could have easily rebuilt the
Waco compound that Reno turned into a crematory...
But wait! Clinton was far too busy granting amnesty to home-grown terrorists
(get that Hillary vote) while spending monies given him from Communist
China.
And Clinton's gal, the Atty. General who advocated masturbation? Jocylen?
Didn't she go obscure right after her son was arrested for drug sales?

Oh, and not let us forget Roger Clinton, the half-brother druggie supreme
who snorted more Cocaine than a vacuum sweeper.

And last, but most importantly. 95% of the wealthiest people in this country
pay 80% of the taxes gathered. The low earners, the ones you support, pay a
pittance compared to the rich. Your claim is pure Democrat poppycock.

On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 03:59:06 -0500, "Arf! Arf!"
wrote in :


"Barnard Peters" wrote in message
newsan.2006.10.04.05.40.06.32926@blueplanet.. .
On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 22:38:32 +0000, Slow Code wrote:

None,

They complain about it being dark and wait for a republican to do it.

They accomplish this task by contracting Haliburtian to pile up dead US
solders to reach the light bulb made by GE. Due to this huge expense, they
pass more tax cuts for rich republicans so nobody (who counts) is hurt
financially. Everybody's a winner! Right?
=
Heck. Maybe The Slickster and Janet could have used Halliburton to rebuild
the World Trade Center the first time it was bombed. Or, and get this...how
about if Halliburton would have rebuilt the USS Cole? Or the Marine barracks
in Lebanon?
I bet a little bit of that Halliburton money could have easily rebuilt the
Waco compound that Reno turned into a crematory...
But wait! Clinton was far too busy granting amnesty to home-grown terrorists
(get that Hillary vote)


http://archive.salon.com/news/col/co...ons/index.html


while spending monies given him from Communist
China.


How do you think Bush is financing his war?


And Clinton's gal, the Atty. General who advocated masturbation? Jocylen?
Didn't she go obscure right after her son was arrested for drug sales?

Oh, and not let us forget Roger Clinton, the half-brother druggie supreme
who snorted more Cocaine than a vacuum sweeper.


http://www.hereinreality.com/familyvalues.html


And last, but most importantly. 95% of the wealthiest people in this country
pay 80% of the taxes gathered. The low earners, the ones you support, pay a
pittance compared to the rich.


Yeah, those taxes are really putting the pinch on the well-to-do. We
should relieve the burden on the rich by sending IRS agents out on the
streets to shake down the homeless and senior citizens, huh?


Your claim is pure Democrat poppycock.


Go blow a goat.

Yeah...like I'm going to waste my time following and reading your Leftista
links....

Guess agan...

Yeah, those taxes are really putting the pinch on the well-to-do. We
should relieve the burden on the rich by sending IRS agents out on the
streets to shake down the homeless and senior citizens, huh?

The Homeless are not paying taxes. WE are paying for their medical care. We,
as in ME!
And I dare you to show me a single instance of the IRS "shaking down" the
homeless. Name ONE instance and back it up with facts.
Show me where the IRS is attacking senior citizens. Seems to me it was Al
Gore who increased the taxes on Social Security...monies that our Senior
Citizens rely on to live from day to day.
It was Al Gore who placed a "fee" on everybody's phone bills and wouldn't
exempt the Seniors.

Blow a goat? How about if you tell the truth?

On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 05:46:30 -0500, "Arf! Arf!"
wrote in :




Yeah, those taxes are really putting the pinch on the well-to-do. We
should relieve the burden on the rich by sending IRS agents out on the
streets to shake down the homeless and senior citizens, huh?

The Homeless are not paying taxes. WE are paying for their medical care. We,
as in ME!


You think you are the only one? Get a clue. Supporting those who have
no means to support themselves is one of the costs of living in a
civilized society. If that concept evades your understanding, how
about a translation from the Big Dummy's Guide to Republican Values:
"We pay off the beggars so they don't become theives and steal our
****, or get restless and overthrow the politicians that we bought and
paid for with our hard-earned money."


And I dare you to show me a single instance of the IRS "shaking down" the
homeless. Name ONE instance and back it up with facts.
Show me where the IRS is attacking senior citizens.


Where did I say they did?


Seems to me it was Al
Gore who increased the taxes on Social Security...monies that our Senior
Citizens rely on to live from day to day.
It was Al Gore who placed a "fee" on everybody's phone bills and wouldn't
exempt the Seniors.


http://www.ssa.gov/history/InternetMyths2.html


Blow a goat? How about if you tell the truth?


I just did.

Arf! Arf! wrote:

Oh, and not let us forget Roger Clinton, the half-brother druggie supreme
who snorted more Cocaine than a vacuum sweeper.

Aren't you forgetting a well-known cokehead + alcoholic political leader
and his "dime-bag" wife...?

Dick Chisel wrote:

Arf! Arf! wrote:

Oh, and not let us forget Roger Clinton, the half-brother druggie supreme
who snorted more Cocaine than a vacuum sweeper.

Aren't you forgetting a well-known cokehead + alcoholic political leader
and his "dime-bag" wife...?

Teddy Kennedy? Carter Grabarczyk, K8VT?

On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 03:59:06 -0500, Arf! Arf! wrote:


"Barnard Peters" wrote in message
newsan.2006.10.04.05.40.06.32926@blueplanet... On Sun, 01 Oct 2006
22:38:32 +0000, Slow Code wrote:

[quoted text muted]


As most wealthy people incorporate any income over ~$200k, those figures
make sense but I still find it had to believe that corporations,
millionaires and billionaires get away with sub-$100k tax bills. I guess
I'm not one of the wealthy people like you. Go figure...

I guess I'm one of the swing voters now but the reason I no longer respect
the republican party has been the worst of two evil philosophy. I have
come to realize that I would rather have a prez that gets blow-jobs from
19 or 20 year old girls than a prez that lies about being Christan while
behind the curtain, killing people to make other people rich and messing
with our freedoms to promote it. There has only been increases of
terrorism and WMD making all those arguments bogus.

Giving money to Communist china?!!! The corporations, in moving most
all their manufacturing to China in the last 8 years have overwhelmed
China with money and they don't know how to spend it fast enough! Makes
one wonder who is running the whitehouse?

It will be quite interesting to see if the Democrats get to spend $100M
to investigate Bush just like the republicans did to investigate
the Clintons. Perhaps those drunken little daughters escapades will come
back to light! LOL

Barnard Peters wrote:


I guess I'm one of the swing voters now but the reason I no longer respect
the republican party has been the worst of two evil philosophy. I have
come to realize that I would rather have a prez that gets blow-jobs from
19 or 20 year old girls than a prez that lies about being Christan while
behind the curtain, killing people to make other people rich and messing
with our freedoms to promote it. There has only been increases of
terrorism and WMD making all those arguments bogus.

Very well said!