Dee Flint wrote:
"Slow Code" wrote in message
link.net...
I might propose that to the FCC.

20 wpm Extra's have more important QSO's than nickle hams and
no-coders do, that's why we should get spectrum priority.

SC

Hocky Puck. From a 20wpm Extra.


didn't you mean to say mean to say a "2 min extra"??, you cocksucking
fat whore!

Dee, N8UZE

UZE is what drips from your box, tramp!

On 19 Oct 2006 18:00:48 -0700, "I PUNCE" wrote:


Dee Flint wrote:
"Slow Code" wrote in message
link.net...
I might propose that to the FCC.

20 wpm Extra's have more important QSO's than nickle hams and
no-coders do, that's why we should get spectrum priority.

SC

Hocky Puck. From a 20wpm Extra.


didn't you mean to say mean to say a "2 min extra"??, you cocksucking
fat whore!
wow looks like yet another wismen sockpuppet

Dee, N8UZE

UZE is what drips from your box, tramp!
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

The FCC say's that the 20 wpm extras or no more important than someone with
just 5 wpm. Isn't that why they changed it from 20 to 5 wpm for ALL HF
LICENSE CLASSES. What your talking about is that you don't want to follow
FCC rules. If there is a QSO on a frequency YOU should move not the people
already there. Unless you have emergency traffic you have NO priority over
anyone who is licensed to operate on any giving frequency. Have you even
past a ham test? Maybe your license should be revoked until you can prove
you have read and fully understand the part 97 FCC rules.

On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 23:20:47 -0400, "if you say so"
wrote:

The FCC say's that the 20 wpm extras or no more important than someone with
just 5 wpm. Isn't that why they changed it from 20 to 5 wpm for ALL HF
LICENSE CLASSES. What your talking about is that you don't want to follow
FCC rules. If there is a QSO on a frequency YOU should move not the people
already there. Unless you have emergency traffic you have NO priority over
anyone who is licensed to operate on any giving frequency. Have you even
past a ham test? Maybe your license should be revoked until you can prove
you have read and fully understand the part 97 FCC rules.
that would serve the interests of the ars

OTOH merely advocating something stupid is not cause for revoking his
license

http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

wrote in message
...
OTOH merely advocating something stupid is not cause for revoking his
license.

That is true.

The cause for revoking his license is that he has a problem with following
the FCC's rules. The rules are there for the benefit all of us. If he
doesn't like the rules he should turn in his license in protest not spread
hate. What ever happened to the true sprit of ham radio where those with
higher knowledge would help left up those with less instead of pushing them
down.

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 20:25:41 -0400, "if you say so"
wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
OTOH merely advocating something stupid is not cause for revoking his
license.

That is true.

The cause for revoking his license is that he has a problem with following
the FCC's rules. The rules are there for the benefit all of us. If he
doesn't like the rules he should turn in his license in protest not spread
hate. What ever happened to the true sprit of ham radio where those with
higher knowledge would help left up those with less instead of pushing them
down.

i think it ot hit by the zombie making gas that you in some of the
Living Dead movies but other than the assitance of VE's runing test
session I have never been ofered assiatnace

http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com