From:

(Scott*in*Baltimore)

Saddam Hussein, that is.


Yet he had nothing to do with 911, the reason Bush said we were there in
the first place.
Bush made a conscious decision to lie to the American public in order
to carry out his personal vendetta against the man who tried to waste
his father. Bush was/is willing to trade x amount of American lives to
achieve his wants,
not for the safety or security of this country, but for his own
He should be tried for war crimes alongside Rumsfeld, which Germany
recently indicted and since he stepped aside, is no longer afforded the
protection top officials receive.

Hussein had to swing, otherwise, history would have been even more
unkind (if that's even possible) to Bush after Iraq re-elected him as
president, because that's probably what would have happened after Bush
pulls out of Iraq (and declares a false and hollow victory). That
country is every bit as divided as ours was the last few years, smack
dab right down the middle.
I find it amusing the Bush regime aided in expediting the trial to the
extent it did and agreed with the sentence but found it too macabre to
air.

The world looks at Bush as more of a threat to world peace than Iraq,
Iran or any other country dubbed "hostile" by dubya and they are right.
Clinton got a blowjob but Bush is screwing the country. But of course,
you will be hard pressed these days to find anyone supporting the US
occupation in Iraq except for armchair generals and chickenhawks who
have no relatives in combat.