Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
james wrote:
Go and do some research. Gain increases as frequency decreases. The major problem of using this device at 27 MHz is keeping the gain low enough so that the amp will be stable. Any amp using this part at 27MHz will have to have a lot of feedback to minimize gain. Yes the gain would be high at 27MHz... however... having too much gain is never really a big problem... you can always throttle it back. It's having too little gain that comes to get you... LOL www.telstar-electronics.com |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5 Jan 2007 10:16:50 -0800, "Telstar Electronics"
wrote: +++james wrote: +++ Go and do some research. Gain increases as frequency decreases. The +++ major problem of using this device at 27 MHz is keeping the gain low +++ enough so that the amp will be stable. Any amp using this part at +++ 27MHz will have to have a lot of feedback to minimize gain. +++ +++Yes the gain would be high at 27MHz... however... having too much gain +++is never really a big problem... you can always throttle it back. It's +++having too little gain that comes to get you... LOL +++ +++www.telstar-electronics.com ********** right, keep on thinking man. Get a unity gain with the right feedback and you have an oscillator. james |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 06 Jan 2007 02:31:08 GMT, james wrote
in : On 5 Jan 2007 10:16:50 -0800, "Telstar Electronics" wrote: +++james wrote: +++ Go and do some research. Gain increases as frequency decreases. The +++ major problem of using this device at 27 MHz is keeping the gain low +++ enough so that the amp will be stable. Any amp using this part at +++ 27MHz will have to have a lot of feedback to minimize gain. +++ +++Yes the gain would be high at 27MHz... however... having too much gain +++is never really a big problem... you can always throttle it back. It's +++having too little gain that comes to get you... LOL +++ +++www.telstar-electronics.com ********** right, keep on thinking man. Get a unity gain with the right feedback and you have an oscillator. Especially with a high input impedance and large internal capacitance. Try to run them puppies hard outside the recommended frequency range and -=POOF=-!!! |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frank Gilliland wrote:
Especially with a high input impedance and large internal capacitance. Try to run them puppies hard outside the recommended frequency range and -=POOF=-!!! Nonsense Frank... I have built amplifiers at 40MHz with these MRF173s with no problem. That's like saying since a 2N3055 has an Ft=2.5MHz... that you couldn't use for an audio amp... or they would blow up... LOL www.telstar-electronics.com |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6 Jan 2007 06:23:18 -0800, "Telstar Electronics"
wrote in . com: Frank Gilliland wrote: Especially with a high input impedance and large internal capacitance. Try to run them puppies hard outside the recommended frequency range and -=POOF=-!!! Nonsense Frank... I have built amplifiers at 40MHz with these MRF173s with no problem. Uh-huh. That's why you are unloading them at a fraction of the market price, right? That's like saying since a 2N3055 has an Ft=2.5MHz... that you couldn't use for an audio amp... or they would blow up... LOL Incredible..... how do you manage to stick your foot so deep into your mouth? The 2N3055 is bipolar, has a relatively low input impedance, and is -INTENDED- for frequencies from DC through audio and up. Not only that, your implication is that the transition frequency (Ft) is the intended operation frequency when in fact it is the point at which the transistor exhibits unity gain, making it pracitically useless at that frequency. So where's that schematic, Brian? |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frank Gilliland wrote:
Incredible..... how do you manage to stick your foot so deep into your mouth? The 2N3055 is bipolar, has a relatively low input impedance, and is -INTENDED- for frequencies from DC through audio and up. Not only that, your implication is that the transition frequency (Ft) is the intended operation frequency when in fact it is the point at which the transistor exhibits unity gain, making it pracitically useless at that frequency. Frank, don't know any nice way of saying it... you're just plain stupid. www.telstar-electronics.com |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6 Jan 2007 08:49:45 -0800, "Brian 'Hack-and-Quack' Griffey"
wrote in .com: Frank Gilliland wrote: Incredible..... how do you manage to stick your foot so deep into your mouth? The 2N3055 is bipolar, has a relatively low input impedance, and is -INTENDED- for frequencies from DC through audio and up. Not only that, your implication is that the transition frequency (Ft) is the intended operation frequency when in fact it is the point at which the transistor exhibits unity gain, making it pracitically useless at that frequency. Quack, quack, quack, quack, quack, quack, quack, quack, quack, quack, quack. Your feathers are a bit ruffled, Brian. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: Alinco Dj-V5 TH High Power Dual Band HT New in Box | Swap | |||
FA: Alinco DJ-V5 TH High Power Dual Band HT New In Box | Equipment | |||
Because I Got High-Michael Bryant | Shortwave | |||
FA: MOTOROLA MCS-2000 HIGH POWER VHF TYPE II | Swap | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna |