Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frank Gilliland wrote:
Oh great, now he's crossposting his spam..... On 7 Jan 2007 06:57:03 -0800, "Brian 'Hack-n-Quack' Griffey" wrote in .com: Thanks to the several people who have responded already. They were sharp enough to copy & paste the original questionaire... with their responses... and send via email. Actually, I was surprised at some of the responses... but that's good. That means that my ideas for the feature list may not be mainstream. I'm looking forward to others responding so I can see trends as they develop. You're no better a liar than you are an engineer, Brian. Just remember.... 34 watts!!! He is a piece of work. To bad there are those who will take his bait hook, line & sinker. |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 21:00:38 -0500, jim wrote
in : Frank Gilliland wrote: Oh great, now he's crossposting his spam..... On 7 Jan 2007 06:57:03 -0800, "Brian 'Hack-n-Quack' Griffey" wrote in .com: Thanks to the several people who have responded already. They were sharp enough to copy & paste the original questionaire... with their responses... and send via email. Actually, I was surprised at some of the responses... but that's good. That means that my ideas for the feature list may not be mainstream. I'm looking forward to others responding so I can see trends as they develop. You're no better a liar than you are an engineer, Brian. Just remember.... 34 watts!!! He is a piece of work. To bad there are those who will take his bait hook, line & sinker. There won't be too many, not with the bad reputation he's creating for himself in this group by having his ignorant ass handed to him all the time. I'm beginning to think the fool actually -wants- to fail. |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
jim wrote:
He is a piece of work. To bad there are those who will take his bait hook, line & sinker. Thanks again for your expert recommendations. I hope others will visit http://www.telstar-electronics.com/d...evelopment.htm and do the same. www.telstar-electronics.com |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frank Dullard wrote:
There won't be too many, not with the bad reputation he's creating for himself in this group by having his ignorant ass handed to him all the time. I'm beginning to think the fool actually -wants- to fail. Thanks Mr. Dullard for your comments. I hope others will visit http://www.telstar-electronics.com/d...evelopment.htm and provide us with constructive material. www.telstar-electronics.com |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frank Dullard wrote:
You're a lame duck, Brian. Migrate. Thanks for that very important comment Mr. Dullard. www.telstar-electronics.com |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Telstar Electronics" wrote...
jim wrote: Brian, do you ask these questions in any other forum other than this? A periodical perhaps? Readers here will follow threads you start and see the responses from other operators trashing your claims. How do you think that sits with potential consumers? Have you patented any of your inventions? Does the FCC know what you intend to sell to the public? Readers want to know... I have not asked in other forums at this time. Can you recommend others? On your Web site? Maybe you could even ask other CB related Web sites if they wish to place the questions on their Web site. How does this sit with potential customers? Very good. They know that we are serious about providing excellent products, and value their feedback. I also feel that customers should know that their requirements are considered, but you still have to consider that replies here are public and will be cached. Any questions will get a certain amount of nasty replies, but on this group you are just begging for offensive replies. I often do a Google search on a company before dealing with them - see if there are any comments or records of problems. If potential customers research your business or products, would you want them to see the kind of thing that gets posted on this group? I would consider private replies, with the figures being made public to show that you listened to customers. Does the FCC know? Maybe you could inform the FCC that this device will be sold to the public. Is the FCC bothered about speech processors? james wrote: Zero. Since it is well documented that Audio processing has marginal performance improvements on a amplitude signal. Thus the rest of the survey would be no more than a "1" if applicable. Oh, but you have given input. You are not interested in such a device. Oh, but he could be. If more people say the same, would you consider changing your plans to fit the market - or are you just wanting to sell your idea of what they should want? Regards, Peter. http://www.citizensband.radiouk.com/ |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 8, 4:54 am, "Telstar Electronics"
wrote: jim wrote: He is a piece of work. To bad there are those who will take his bait hook, line & sinker. Thanks again for your expert recommendations. I hope others will visithttp://www.telstar-electronics.com/default_files/NewProductDevelopmen... and do the same. www.telstar-electronics.com The suggestions keep coming in... and some are very good. Thanks for your recommendations so far! www.telstar-electronics.com |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Input Bandwidth of an ADC. | Homebrew | |||
Input stage for VHF frequency counter in an FPGA? | Homebrew | |||
Free speech | Antenna | |||
How to measure soil constants at HF | Antenna | |||
Here's Your Answer, Todd.... | Policy |