Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello Jimmie D:
Well the Moonraker 4 and 6 element beams where a great design for the hardware to get real cheap for production. The Hubs that attached the Elements to the Boom are made from Cast Aluminum. Real cheap to manufacture, but in time they break and crack making the Moonraker Beams useless. I had new Hubs made from 6061 T6 Billet Aluminum made from a CNC Mill. Now the Hubs are bullet proof. But expensive! But the problem for manufacturing something using large quantities of materials is always been a design art. Jay in the Mojave Jimmie D wrote: The moonraker is a pretty decent antenna but like a lot of CB antennas the manufctures were trying to sell elements. They stuff as many elements as they can on a boom that is still UPS shipable. I remember back in the 70s how a few people would claim that ther e3 element beam was better than the 4 they used to have and now I believe they may have been right. I extended the boom on mine and respaced the elements vertical for 11M and horizontal for 10. Any way I guess the point I was trying to make to start with before I rambled is that my Al tubing and coax gamma match easily handles a full KW on 10. Why cant the manufacturers make something that is so easy to make? At the risk of appearing to answer my own question I think it was because if they did consumers would realize you can go down to the hardware store and buy the parts and roll your own about as easy as you can build thiers out of the box. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Speech Processor Product - Your Input is Requested | CB | |||
Free speech | Antenna | |||
Here's Your Answer, Todd.... | Policy | |||
AMATEUR'S USE AMATEUR AUXILIARY TO SUPPRESS FREE SPEECH | Policy | |||
Heil Clear Speech | Shortwave |